PDA

View Full Version : 300.4(F)


ryan_618
05-11-2005, 09:42 PM
(F) Insulated Fittings. Where raceways containing delete "ungrounded"ungrounded conductors 4 AWG or larger enter a cabinet, box enclosure, or raceway, the conductors shall be protected by a substantial fitting providing a smoothly rounded insulating surface, unless the conductors are separated from the fitting or raceway by substantial insulating material that is securely fastened in place.
Exception: Where threaded hubs or bosses that are an integral part of a cabinet, box enclosure, or raceway provide a smoothly rounded or flared entry for conductors.
Conduit bushings constructed wholly of insulating material shall not be used to secure a fitting or raceway. The insulating fitting or insulating material shall have a temperature rating not less than the insulation temperature rating of the installed conductors.


Change to read:


(F) Insulated Fittings. Where raceways containing conductors 4 AWG or larger enter a cabinet, box enclosure, or raceway, the conductors shall be protected by a substantial fitting providing a smoothly rounded insulating surface, unless the conductors are separated from the fitting or raceway by substantial insulating material that is securely fastened in place.
Exception: Where threaded hubs or bosses that are an integral part of a cabinet, box enclosure, or raceway provide a smoothly rounded or flared entry for conductors.
Conduit bushings constructed wholly of insulating material shall not be used to secure a fitting or raceway. The insulating fitting or insulating material shall have a temperature rating not less than the insulation temperature rating of the installed conductors.


Substantiation:

As written, this important protection requirement does not apply to the grounded conductor. The grounded conductor, in many cases, is every bit as dangerous as the ungrounded conductor. This is especially true when multi-wire circuits are employed. Isolated phase installations permitted by 300.3(B)(1) are an example of where this could apply.

[ May 11, 2005, 09:55 PM: Message edited by: ryan_618 ]

charlie
05-11-2005, 10:01 PM
This is getting boring, I agree with this one as well. :D

George Stolz
05-11-2005, 10:01 PM
Looks good, one thought:

Originally posted by ryan_618:
...the conductors shall be protected by a substantial fitting providing a smoothly rounded insulating surface...What does substantial mean? Have you seen a bushing with no substance? :)

George Stolz
05-11-2005, 10:02 PM
Jinx!

ryan_618
05-11-2005, 10:07 PM
[quote]Originally posted by charlie:
[b] This is getting boring, I agree with this one as well. :) Pretty soon I'll get the guts to propose somthing in article 240 :p

charlie
05-11-2005, 10:08 PM
George, how about solidly built; strong for a definition. That is straight out of the dictionary which is what is supposed to be used if the definition is not in the Code. In other words, I don't feel like it is a nebulous statement. :D

ryan_618
05-11-2005, 10:28 PM
The only thing I don't like about this provision is that, technically speaking, it doesn't allow steel chase nipples :(

don_resqcapt19
05-12-2005, 01:46 PM
I would add the words "or cables" after raceways. The same problem exists with cable connectors as with raceway terminations.
Don