Does anyone know what procedures Utilities follow to size their secondary conductors to a service? Do they follow 125% * continuous load + non-continuouse load like the NEC. I have heard that they size conductors based on demand factors as well. This is in the case where the utility installs and owns the secondary otherwise I the electrical contractor would obviously adhear to NEC becuase I know that some utilities require the electrical contracotr to supply the secondary conductors.
I have a example that I recently ran into. The connected load on a pump station with a proposed 120/240, 1-ph, 3W service was as follows:
15 H.P. on 25 H.P. VFD (converting 240V 1-ph input to 3-ph, 240 output) = 140 A
5kW Electric Unit Heater @ 240 = 21 A
Lighting = 2.5 A
Dehumidifier = 3.0 A
Receptacels = 2.0 A
Total Connected Load = 168.5 A.
Since it has a motor load I would assume to size the conductors for motor load plus all other loads per 430.62 correct?
Since actually the VFD draws 140 FLA then
125% * 140A = 175A
+21A+2.5A+3A+2A = 203.5 A which means that #4/0 min 70 deg C conductors must be used (ampacity = 230 amps)
Can I still size the conductors like and look at the VFD as the true motor load? What article would address this if not?
For overcurrent protection I would assume to adhear to 430.62 and size the OCPD as follows:
The max. recommended overcurrent protection for the VFD per the manufacturer is 175A so I would add this to the FLA of all the other loads?
I would use 175A+21A+2.5A+3A+2A = 203.5 A
And I would be permitted to go up to a 225A Breaker or fuse for the main disconnect ?
I am unsure I am totally correct in how I arrived at the conductor and overcurrent protection sizing but I guess the question comes back to how does the Utility look at this and size their conductors. I was told that the Utility is providing a 200 amp service with a #3/0 triplex secondary. Does this mean that typical Utilties insure their service upto their rating so in this case they assume that the transformer (unknown size) and the #3/0 secondary can carry a continuous load of 200 amps or do they apply a multiplying factor to the connected load that differs from NEC?
I have a example that I recently ran into. The connected load on a pump station with a proposed 120/240, 1-ph, 3W service was as follows:
15 H.P. on 25 H.P. VFD (converting 240V 1-ph input to 3-ph, 240 output) = 140 A
5kW Electric Unit Heater @ 240 = 21 A
Lighting = 2.5 A
Dehumidifier = 3.0 A
Receptacels = 2.0 A
Total Connected Load = 168.5 A.
Since it has a motor load I would assume to size the conductors for motor load plus all other loads per 430.62 correct?
Since actually the VFD draws 140 FLA then
125% * 140A = 175A
+21A+2.5A+3A+2A = 203.5 A which means that #4/0 min 70 deg C conductors must be used (ampacity = 230 amps)
Can I still size the conductors like and look at the VFD as the true motor load? What article would address this if not?
For overcurrent protection I would assume to adhear to 430.62 and size the OCPD as follows:
The max. recommended overcurrent protection for the VFD per the manufacturer is 175A so I would add this to the FLA of all the other loads?
I would use 175A+21A+2.5A+3A+2A = 203.5 A
And I would be permitted to go up to a 225A Breaker or fuse for the main disconnect ?
I am unsure I am totally correct in how I arrived at the conductor and overcurrent protection sizing but I guess the question comes back to how does the Utility look at this and size their conductors. I was told that the Utility is providing a 200 amp service with a #3/0 triplex secondary. Does this mean that typical Utilties insure their service upto their rating so in this case they assume that the transformer (unknown size) and the #3/0 secondary can carry a continuous load of 200 amps or do they apply a multiplying factor to the connected load that differs from NEC?