ivsenroute
Senior Member
- Location
- Florida
Yes it is NM in the liquid-tight
NM in conduit outside
- Thread starter ivsenroute
- Start date
- Status
- Location
- Massachusetts
Nice job with the picture taking. 
jaylectricity
Senior Member
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Occupation
- licensed journeyman electrician
If you get rid of the jacket, you just have conductors and a bare copper ground. No longer NM, right?
ivsenroute
Senior Member
- Location
- Florida
You still don't have wire that is clearly labeled THWN
electricmanscott
Senior Member
- Location
- Boston, MA
I don't see any NM in liquid tight
.
.
jaylectricity
Senior Member
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Occupation
- licensed journeyman electrician
I accidentally rubbed off the markings.
nyhockey
Senior Member
- Location
- long island, ny
Yes it is NM in the liquid-tight
were does that second bare wire go? I can't follow it.:roll:
nyhockey
Senior Member
- Location
- long island, ny
- Location
- Chapel Hill, NC
- Occupation
- Retired Electrical Contractor
One goes to the a/c unit the other comes in the back as the feed from the house.
nyhockey
Senior Member
- Location
- long island, ny
Terminated ????????????
ty
Senior Member
- Location
- 3rd Rock from the Sun
the ground bar has 2 holes. you cannot see the other because of the pic angle.
it is probably NM cable inside the liquid tight, and that is not allowed. Even with the jacket removed the conductors are THHN rated only,
and even though most conductors are dual rated but the conductors inside the cable assembly have been rated to be used with the jacket.
In other word No NM in a wet location with or without the outside jacket.
and also as previously suggested 200.7(C)(1)
and even though most conductors are dual rated but the conductors inside the cable assembly have been rated to be used with the jacket.
In other word No NM in a wet location with or without the outside jacket.
and also as previously suggested 200.7(C)(1)
you've been told WRONG
jwjrw
Senior Member
I was told that by the southland wire rep. He said the insulation is basically the same. Maybe I was told wrong maybe I wasn't. Without it being legal since it isnt marked thhn it really dosent matter anyway. But since you seem to know everything what is the difference in the insulation? Maybe the rep knows less or more than you or his definition of "basically the same" is different than yours.
peter d
Senior Member
- Location
- New England
OK, it's a code violation. No argument here. Once again minor issue. I wouldn't be concerned about it.
- Location
- Simi Valley, CA
That's the second time I've seen you say that today. When do you get concerned?
- Status