Device Wiring

Status
Not open for further replies.

scnkapc

Member
Where in the 2011 NEC does it state that you can no longer or cannot use a device (receptacle) to carry the circuit and that if you have more than one cable (romex/MC) in a receptacle box that it shall be pig-tailed? Inspector are making us pig-tail all wires for receptacles.
 

texie

Senior Member
Location
Fort Collins, Colorado
Occupation
Electrician, Contractor, Inspector
Where in the 2011 NEC does it state that you can no longer or cannot use a device (receptacle) to carry the circuit and that if you have more than one cable (romex/MC) in a receptacle box that it shall be pig-tailed? Inspector are making us pig-tail all wires for receptacles.

It's not required. But keep in mind if it is part of a MWBC, of course the neutral would have to be per 300.13(B). But that is not new-it's always been the case.
 
There is something that says that a recept has to be wire so that if that device is removed the other recpts on the circuit will not be affected...I know its there, I have to find it.


Should have checked 300.13 first...duh
 

acrwc10

Master Code Professional
Location
CA
Occupation
Building inspector
There is something that says that a recept has to be wire so that if that device is removed the other recpts on the circuit will not be affected...I know its there, I have to find it.


Should have checked 300.13 first...duh

The only concern is that the grounded conductor of a Multi Wire Branch Circuit not be disrupted. If you shut down the rest of the circuit by removing an ungrounded/hot wire off a device the code doesn't care, it does care that you not put a high (phase to phase) voltage on the circuit by opening the neutral on a MWBC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top