Besoker blender

Status
Not open for further replies.
T

T.M.Haja Sahib

Guest
I took the following paras from
http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?t=145581 (post#103)
Besoeker; said:
You are no doubt conversant with the definition of the Amp?re as the constant current that willproduce an attractive force of 2 ? 10^ -7 newton per metre of length between two straight, parallel conductors of infinite length and negligible circular cross section placed one metre apart in a vacuum.

That gives us a starting point. Let’s assume that the fault current is 10kA. We have something under that from the supply in our test bay so maybe not an unreasonable assumption. How far apart are the MOVs? Say 20mm (about ? of an inch). Chuck those numbers into the Besoeker blender and you come up with a force of 5N.
The result of 5N from Besoeker blender appears to be too small to be correct.
 
Last edited:

charlie b

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Lockport, IL
Occupation
Retired Electrical Engineer
Looks too high to me. I am presuming that the force varies linearly with the distance between the conductors. So if the force is 2E-7 at one meter with one amp of current, then at 20 mm (1/50 meters), with 10,000 amps of current, the force would be (2E-7) x 50 x 10,000, or 0.1N. What am I missing? :?
 

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
It's generally taken as being an inverse square law rather than linear.
The inverse square law is based on force emanating from a single point. The ampere definition uses parallel conductors, so the emanation of force is cylindrical rather than spherical (i.e. think of it as an infinite series of overlapping spheres along each conductor as the equal force lines).
 
Last edited:
T

T.M.Haja Sahib

Guest
Force=2x10^-7xIXIXL/D, where I=Current, L=length of current element, D=distance between them. Assuming I=10000A, L=0.08m, D=0.02m, the force
F= 2x10^-7x10000x10000x0.08/0.02=2x10x4=80N
 

charlie b

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Lockport, IL
Occupation
Retired Electrical Engineer
It's generally taken as being an inverse square law rather than linear.
Things that spread out from a single point tend to follow an inverse square law. Things that sit between infinite parallel planes tend to be uniform. I wasn't sure about infinite parallel lines. But if you are right about that relationship, it would make the force (2E-7) x 50 x 50 x 10,000, or 5N. So I confirm your calculation.
 

pfalcon

Senior Member
Location
Indiana
Dissipation due to distance is derived from the area formula of the expanding wave.

From a point: Spherical Area = 4(pi)r2
From a line: Cylindrical Area = 2(pi)rh
From a plane: Planar Area = wh

A point wave ratio of 1m (1000mm) to 20mm would be (1000/20)2=502=2500:1
A line wave ratio of 1m (1000mm) to 20mm would be (1000/20)=50:1
A plane wave ratio of 1m (1000mm) to 20mm would be 1:1
 
T

T.M.Haja Sahib

Guest
I limited it to that because it's fairly typical of what I come across on the LV supply.
The surge voltage in the building wiring system does not exceed 10kV. But the surge current can have much higher magnitude. Arresters with rating of even 160kA are available.
 

Besoeker

Senior Member
Location
UK
The surge voltage in the building wiring system does not exceed 10kV. But the surge current can have much higher magnitude. Arresters with rating of even 160kA are available.
I'm not sure that's entirely relevant.
The (closed) thread from which you took my post was about surge suppression devices on a 600V (i.e LV) system.
 
T

T.M.Haja Sahib

Guest
I think you now agree that a surge arrester with parallel elements can also be damaged by mechanical force of surge current passing through them and not only by heat energy of the currents.
 
Last edited:

Besoeker

Senior Member
Location
UK
I think you now agree that a surge arrester with parallel elements can also be damaged by mechanical force of surge current passing through them and not only by heat energy of the currents.
Now agree???
I don't believe I ever excluded that as a possibility.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top