That 8X multiplier is my point ,,,per 314.28(A)(3),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,#1 smaller dimensions may be allowed.......if and when........#2 fill is less than allowed........when marked.......and listed.......with the number of conductors allowed.
Lets use 4/0 as an example,,,,,,,max fill of a 4" conduit is 11 conductors and lets say we are only going to use 4 and the manufactured had tested.listed and marked the fitting for 6. Then according to 314.28(A)(3) the overall length can be reduced,now reduced by how much is not the question and the answer must be the standard manufactured length of the fitting itself that is listed and marked.
Thats where the disagreement starts,then someone says,"Thats not what that means" and someone else says you are right,"It means this" which is different than the 1st etc etc etc
I'm not confused are you or are we all
so maybe what the OP author saw was an installation based on the above but where 3,4,5 or 6 conductors was going to be used.The decision to install in that manner had to be based on something.
I'm not disagreeing on the 6 or 8X notations, starting parameters need to be established if rules are to be written and then additional rules can amend,How many times have you heard"You need to be a Philadelphia Lawyer to read and understand that".
dick