PetrosA
Senior Member
- Location
- Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Then I would think that it would be a no brainer for a manufacturer who does not have such a requirement would be guaranteed a market all to themselves. If such a product was available those who believe that the necessity to install an SPD next to the main is bogus and snake oil would be buying a product that doesn't have the requirement. I'm not aware that there is a manufacturer of an SPD that doesn't have this requirement.
Other that trying to make the installers life miserable why would a manufacturer want to irritate their customers with this install requirement if it doesn't improve its performance?
I'm just trying to justify why manufacturers included this as an installation requirement if there is no competitive advantage, it is not an NEC requirement other than art 110-3-b, and may not be a UL requirement unless it has been included in getting the product UL listed.
Either it is an important requirement or it's bogus. The what advantage woud there be for the manufacturer to include such a requirement? If there is no logical reason what would be the purpose be other than to irritate customers such as the number of posts this subject has generated?
I just looked at the instructions for all the Eaton SPDs, resi, commercial and industrial, on their website (locally available). Only one model "recommends" placing the breaker near the main, but allows placement anywhere practicable, including subpanels. None of the other models even mention placement of the breaker. Where did you see this requirement?