Main Disconnect Location Code

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mike Lamb

Member
Location
Chicago
Could someone please direct me to the reference as to how close the main disconnect should be from where the SEC enters the interior of the house?
 

roger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Fl
Occupation
Retired Electrician
As far as the NEC is concerned see 230.70

Roger
 

liquidtite

Senior Member
Location
Ny
dosnt the main disconect have to be withen 5ft of were the seu enters the bulding or you have to install the main outside
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
The code does not give any specific distance. It says "nearest the point of entrance" and in my opinion it means exactly that. Many areas have local rules that specify a distance. Ours is 10'.
 

ammklq143

Senior Member
Location
Iowa
Occupation
Electrician
225.32 Location. The disconnecting means shall be installed
either inside or outside of the building or structure
served or where the conductors pass through the building or
structure. The disconnecting means shall be at a readily
accessible location nearest the point of entrance of the conductors.
For the purposes of this section, the requirements
in 230.6 shall be utilized.
 

roger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Fl
Occupation
Retired Electrician
225.32 Location. The disconnecting means shall be installed
either inside or outside of the building or structure
served or where the conductors pass through the building or
structure. The disconnecting means shall be at a readily
accessible location nearest the point of entrance of the conductors.
For the purposes of this section, the requirements
in 230.6 shall be utilized.
Although the wording is the same as 230.70, article 225.32 is dealing with feeders not Service Entrances.

Roger
 

texie

Senior Member
Location
Fort Collins, Colorado
Occupation
Electrician, Contractor, Inspector
While the NEC does not exactly specify how far in the bldg. the service disconnect may be, and while some AHJ's do have a specific limit, I'm finding that more and more POCO's that require the main to be outside and ajacent to the meter. I think the thinking on the POCO's part is they don't want to deal with pulling a meter under load, so this is convienent for them to have the main next to the meter.
I seem to remember that George Stolz was going to/did make a proposal to have all service equipment outside. Well, he can take heart in knowing that I have a POCO that requires this-no matter how large or small. On really large services it adds a lot of cost because the equipment is so large it often ends up out in the wilderness away from the building and then you need another disconnect in the MDP to satisfy Art. 225.32. Oh, and don't forget that this now makes the circuit to the building a feeder, and on a large service, this makes for a lot of extra copper for the EGC. I think this is the future, and I'm not so sure that is not a bad idea.
 

roger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Fl
Occupation
Retired Electrician
Well, you are surely right-

but, the OP did say main, not service. Could be fed from the garage . . . :cool:
Ahhh, but the OP did use "SEC" which could mean Service Entrance Conductors. ;)


Roger
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
While the NEC does not exactly specify how far in the bldg. the service disconnect may be, and while some AHJ's do have a specific limit, I'm finding that more and more POCO's that require the main to be outside and ajacent to the meter. I think the thinking on the POCO's part is they don't want to deal with pulling a meter under load, so this is convienent for them to have the main next to the meter.
I seem to remember that George Stolz was going to/did make a proposal to have all service equipment outside. Well, he can take heart in knowing that I have a POCO that requires this-no matter how large or small. On really large services it adds a lot of cost because the equipment is so large it often ends up out in the wilderness away from the building and then you need another disconnect in the MDP to satisfy Art. 225.32. Oh, and don't forget that this now makes the circuit to the building a feeder, and on a large service, this makes for a lot of extra copper for the EGC. I think this is the future, and I'm not so sure that is not a bad idea.
Understandable for small services with self contained metering. Large services usually have CT metering and pulling the meter doesn't disconnect the load. Most (but not all) CT metered services are supplied by an individual transformer anyway so the POCO can and often do disconnect the supply to the transformer without shutting down other users when they need to work on something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top