ElectDesigner
Member
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
Say you are subfeeding a new building (bldg A) from and existing building (bldg B), but to do so the feeder needs to cross a road (future road) to reach the new building. The existing bldg already has direct burried PVC ducts stubbed out from the electrical room. The code in the area allows for either concrete encased duct bank or direct burried (meaning running cable in direct burried PVC duct) configurations, what would you recommend and why?
I understand the mechanical protection a concrete encased duct bank provides, but if the code allows both - the direct burried option seems more economic method.
I would also like to know how condensation is dealth with in underground ducts? I understand that the cable is rated for wet location, but how does one deal with moisture build up in the ducts?
Thanks.
I understand the mechanical protection a concrete encased duct bank provides, but if the code allows both - the direct burried option seems more economic method.
I would also like to know how condensation is dealth with in underground ducts? I understand that the cable is rated for wet location, but how does one deal with moisture build up in the ducts?
Thanks.