What is the de-rating percentage for 8 current carrying in a cord or conductors

Status
Not open for further replies.

O'donisR

Member
Location
Miami
  • Hi everyone, I have problem solving this question that I failed on my exam: What is the de-rating percentage for 8 current carrying in a cord or conductors. The only info I see on the NEC is that where the number of current carrying conductors exceeds three, the allowable ampacity shall be reduce from 3 conductors rating as show in table 400.5.

I think the de-rating % should be calculated at 100%..


Thank you in advance!!
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
  • Hi everyone, I have problem solving this question that I failed on my exam: What is the de-rating percentage for 8 current carrying in a cord or conductors. The only info I see on the NEC is that where the number of current carrying conductors exceeds three, the allowable ampacity shall be reduce from 3 conductors rating as show in table 400.5.

I think the de-rating % should be calculated at 100%..


Thank you in advance!!

Why you say 100%? That would mean no matter the size the ampacity is zero:eek:
 

O'donisR

Member
Location
Miami
Why you say 100%? That would mean no matter the size the ampacity is zero:eek:


for my interpretation of the code:where the number of current carrying conductors exceeds Eight, the allowable ampacity shall be reduce from 3 conductors rating as show in table 400.5. 3 carrying conductors shall be calculated at 100% means that no de-rating is needed.
 

qcroanoke

Sometimes I don't know if I'm the boxer or the bag
Location
Roanoke, VA.
Occupation
Sorta retired........
for my interpretation of the code:where the number of current carrying conductors exceeds Eight, the allowable ampacity shall be reduce from 3 conductors rating as show in table 400.5. 3 carrying conductors shall be calculated at 100% means that no de-rating is needed.

Are you saying that the first three conductors are figured at 100% ampacity and then start counting 1.2.3.4.5?
Meaning you have 8 conductors but derate applies to only 5?
 

O'donisR

Member
Location
Miami
Are you saying that the first three conductors are figured at 100% ampacity and then start counting 1.2.3.4.5?
Meaning you have 8 conductors but derate applies to only 5?

Thank you for reply, I don't I trying to understand this question......Question only ask for the de-rating percentage value for 8 current carrying conductors in a cord or cable. very confuse for me..
 

qcroanoke

Sometimes I don't know if I'm the boxer or the bag
Location
Roanoke, VA.
Occupation
Sorta retired........
Thank you for reply, I don't I trying to understand this question......Question only ask for the de-rating percentage value for 8 current carrying conductors in a cord or cable. very confuse for me..

derate percentage For 8 current carrying conductors in a cord or cable is 70%.
 

O'donisR

Member
Location
Miami
Are you saying that the first three conductors are figured at 100% ampacity and then start counting 1.2.3.4.5?
Meaning you have 8 conductors but derate applies to only 5?


I don't really remember the question very well, should be a missed a data, I will try to get the question right.. so far I know the answer is related with article 400.5.(Where the number of current carrying conductors exceeds three, the allowable ampacity or the ampacity of each conductor shall be reduced from 3-conductors rating as show in table 400.5)

So if I have 8 current carrying conductors in a cord or cable? how can I deduct the allowance ampacity? table 400.5..
 

qcroanoke

Sometimes I don't know if I'm the boxer or the bag
Location
Roanoke, VA.
Occupation
Sorta retired........
I don't really remember the question very well, should be a missed a data, I will try to get the question right.. so far I know the answer is related with article 400.5.(Where the number of current carrying conductors exceeds three, the allowable ampacity or the ampacity of each conductor shall be reduced from 3-conductors rating as show in table 400.5)

So if I have 8 current carrying conductors in a cord or cable? how can I deduct the allowance ampacity? table 400.5..

you would find the ampacity of the conductors in the cable according to the type of cable it is.
for example: SJO cord with #12 conductors from column A in table 400.5 A is good for 20 amps. you use column A because the last line of 400.5 A tells you too.
You have 8 current carrying conductors in your cable. therefore according to table 400.5 you have to derate those conductors to 70% of 20 amps. .70 x 20=14 amps.
I've probably made your confusion worse. My apologizes if I have.
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
Thank you for reply, I don't I trying to understand this question......Question only ask for the de-rating percentage value for 8 current carrying conductors in a cord or cable. very confuse for me..

Forgive my first reply, I don't think I understood just what you were asking at that time.

The use of 400.5(A)(3) is no different than using 310.15(B)(3)(a) except it applies to flexible cords instead of cables and raceways.

Your question mentioned 8 current carrying conductors, doesn't really matter at this point what those conductors are supplying or how many other "non current carrying conductors" may also be in the same cord.

The title of the table even kind of explains a little - "for more than three current carrying conducotors".

For three or less "current carrying" conductors, no additional adjustment is necessary. For three or more, use the adjustment factors in the table. The reason for adjustment is the heat produced within the conductors - the more current carrying conductors there are the more heat there will be, but larger conductors will have less resistance and will give up less heat. It is all about protecting the conductor insulation from overheating. You do not ignore the first three when counting the total number of current carrying conductors.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top