That section was added in the 2008 NEC. I looked up the ROP out of curiosity.
9-92 Log #3406 NEC-P09
Final Action: Accept
(404.8(C) (New) )
________________________________________________________________
Submitter:
Frederic P. Hartwell, Hartwell Electrical Services, Inc.
Recommendation:
Insert a new 404.8(C) as follows:
(C) Multipole Snap Switches. A multipole, general use snap switch shall
not be permitted to be fed from more than a single circuit unless it is listed
and marked as a two-circuit or three-circuit switch, or unless its voltage rating
is not less than the nominal line-to-line voltage of the system supplying the
circuits.
Substantiation:
The device industry still shows no inclination to mark two-
pole switches ?2-circuit?, and thereby allow their use on two circuits with a
total voltage spread within the switch rating. Representatives generally declare
their willingness to act promptly if there were market demand. Unfortunately,
the submitter strongly suspects the lack of demand is a result of lack of
knowledge, and not any lack of applications. In other words, installers are
routinely installing these switches and inspectors are accepting them for want
of any observable hazard. A routinely available 277-volt rated two-pole snap
switch used to control two 120-volt circuits within the ampere rating of the
switch to control related equipment, such as two oil burners, is a completely
reasonable application. It can be frustrated, usually only on paper, by the UL
Guide Card restriction. If this proposal is accepted, UL will have to revisit the
Guide Card information, and the problem will disappear. Note that under the
terms of this proposal, as soon as the potential line-to-line voltage exceeded
that of the switch, the enhanced marking provisions would still apply.
Panel Meeting Action: Accept
Number Eligible to Vote: 11
Ballot Results:
Affirmative: 10
Ballot Not Returned:
1 de Vega, H