thomas.a.boardman
Member
Hi to everyone and I wanted to say that I am happy to be a part of this forum. My question stems from an argument I had with an electrical inspector on Friday. Here is the scenario: I was installing a generator, a automatic transfer switch and a feed through panel on the outside of a house (generator was mounted to a concrete slab next to the house). My employer had looked at the job and determined that we were going to have to move the meter base because it feed out of the back directly into the back of the panel in the house. After digging into the situation I found out that this was not the case and the previous electrician had ran service entrance cable out of the back of the meter base, inside the wall to the panel that was about 5 feet away on the inside. So I mounted my feed through panel (to feed the house but also feed a barn that didn't need to be on the generator) then I mounted my transfer switch, I came directly out of the back of my transfer switch to the existing panel inside the house. Now I am a firm believer in making things look nice and look like there was a plan in mounting equipment so I punched my own holes in the feed through panel and the transfer switch to keep the tops of all cabinets even with each other. In the transfer switch there is a back plate that takes up the whole inside so I had to punch a bigger whole in it to keep my conductors protected. the inspector tells me that I must use the eccentric knock outs that are formed in the enclosures because punching my own holes takes away from the structural integrity of the enclosure. He tells me that this is in the code but I can not find it, and though I asked him to show me he didn't and didn't offer an article to look under. If you take out a mounting piece of the enclosure I could see his concern but that is not what occurred, does any one have any in sight in this matter. There were a few other issues I had with this inspector and I really think he just has it out for me (the company I work for) because I proved him wrong on the last inspection of an explosion proof installation. Any in sight would be greatly appreciated, thank you.