Resturant NM Code

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

bth0mas20

Senior Member
Location
Maryland
I have a job today to work on for a resturant that has been closed down by the county deputy inspector for electrical code violations. The electrical inspector wants me to go thru this resturant with a fine tooth comb and find any problem that I can. He said for me to fix it and make them pay for it and he would back me up on it. This is his way of punishing them for not fixing these problem when they were told to.

My main question:
Thier is alot of romex running thru the ceilings of what used to be a drop ceiling and has since been removed and is now exposed. Is this legal....from reading the code for NM uses I am still second guessing it. I believe that it is ok becuase the building is older. What do you guys think?
 
I think your right since the building is older I think it is grandfathered. But it sounds like the inspector wants you to bring the place up to code. So I'd ask him but I bet he will want you to change it
 
When it was above the drop ceiling, it was not permitted by 334.12(A)(2). . Now that it's exposed, it falls under 334.10(3).

bth0mas20 said:
I believe that it is ok becuase the building is older. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...

You shouldn't be focusing on the age of the building. . You should be questioning when was the drop ceiling was removed. . At that point 334.10(3) comes into play.

Is there no limit on the scope of work ? . Is the county deputy inspector allowed by your state law to set a scope of work beyond any construction plan reviewed documents that are currently being followed ?

David
 
The deputy inspector told me to find any problems and tell them about them. If they had a problem with it then to let him know and he would tell the owner that it will need to be fixed if he wants to open again.

Their is no limit to the scope. This is the resturant side that im working on. Thier is also a bar side that is a nightmare. Right now were focused on the resturant to get it open. I dont want to hurt them too bad becuase thier is 4 times as much money to be made on the bar side that is comming next. By the way this bar makes alot of money when their operating so they are looking to be back as quick as possible. That dosent mean were gonna take any shortcuts though.
 
bth0mas20 said:
He said for me to fix it and make them pay for it and he would back me up on it. This is his way of punishing them for not fixing these problem when they were told to.
Click to expand...

That sounds like a job I would not want to be involved in.

No scope of work in writing, nobody really on the hook to pay for the work.

How well do you know this inspector?
 
bth0mas20 said:
The electrical inspector wants me to go thru this resturant with a fine tooth comb and find any problem that I can. He said for me to fix it and make them pay for it and he would back me up on it.
Click to expand...


I had to read this a couple of times and then think on it a few minutes.

I have to agree with Bob, I'm not even sure the electrical inspector would have the authority to do this.

He could write them up for code volations. He could probably get the Fire Marshal to condemn the building so they would need a new CO just to reopen.

I don't think an electrical inspector would have the right to assign work to any EC. They are not really allowed to recommend anyone ( conflict of interest).

At the owners request I would be more than happy to write up a report on the condition of the wiring and any suggestions and a repair quote. At that time it should be up to the owner if he wisher for you are others to do the repairs ( under contract ).
 
The inspector may 'back you up as punishment for not correcting the problems sooner,' but will he put his money where his mouth is? If the restaurant doesn't pay, is he willing to pony up?
 
bth0mas20 said:
Thier is alot of romex running thru the ceilings of what used to be a drop ceiling and has since been removed and is now exposed. Is this legal....from reading the code for NM uses I am still second guessing it. I believe that it is ok becuase the building is older.
Click to expand...


For that old romex in the ceiling that is exposed you may want to get an opinion from the health inspector. If there is a potential for it to flake off an drop into food or collect grease from cooking it may have to go for health concerns.
 
You don't say how big the resturant is, but it may be classified as an assembly occupancy and the NM cable would be a violation anyway (100 or more).
 
bth0mas20 said:
I have a job today to work on for a resturant that has been closed down by the county deputy inspector for electrical code violations. The electrical inspector wants me to go thru this resturant with a fine tooth comb and find any problem that I can. He said for me to fix it and make them pay for it and he would back me up on it. This is his way of punishing them for not fixing these problem when they were told to.

My main question:
Thier is alot of romex running thru the ceilings of what used to be a drop ceiling and has since been removed and is now exposed. Is this legal....from reading the code for NM uses I am still second guessing it. I believe that it is ok becuase the building is older. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...




If these people get "smart" over the next couple of days, they will find out that the inspector most likely had no right to be in the restuarant to begin with.

Sure we all see pretty bad work in a lot of buildings, and inspectors have a the right to go back to the building department and get a letter written to the owner, if the EI thinks the existing work is hazardous to the publics health and well being. But most BOs know that is not always easy, and that the restaurant owner does not actually have to comply. The BO would then have to go to court to convince the judge that action would have to be taken...not always easy to do.

Inspectors are sort of like prison guards...they have less rights than the prisoners. :wink:
 
bth0mas20 said:
The deputy inspector told me to find any problems and tell them about them. If they had a problem with it then to let him know and he would tell the owner that it will need to be fixed if he wants to open again.
Click to expand...
This is done a lot by inspectors and EC's around here. It makes a great team effort to take care of serious fire hazards and allow the place to open as quickly as the place is brought back into a safer level. Everybody agrees to it going in. The owner, contractor and inspector.

bth0ma20 said:
Their is no limit to the scope. This is the resturant side that im working on. Thier is also a bar side that is a nightmare. Right now were focused on the resturant to get it open. I dont want to hurt them too bad becuase thier is 4 times as much money to be made on the bar side that is comming next. By the way this bar makes alot of money when their operating so they are looking to be back as quick as possible. That dosent mean were gonna take any shortcuts though.
Click to expand...
Just as long as the owner realizes the game plan and agrees to it, I don't see a problem.
 
wbalsam1 said:
Just as long as the owner realizes the game plan and agrees to it, I don't see a problem.
Click to expand...

Abuse of power?

I can't see how the owner is getting any choice, their business has been closed.
 
iwire said:
Abuse of power?

I can't see how the owner is getting any choice, their business has been closed.
Click to expand...

I don't see it as an "abuse of power" by the electrical official who is bound by law to enforce provisions of law that are set out in annual fire safety of public assembly type inspections. I see it as a willingness to work out a deal with the owner and whatever contractor the owner wants to hire.

Another way to look at it might be this way: "abuse of power" by the owner of the bar/restaurant who neglected to pull permits for electrical installations, and neglected to have inspections performed, but allowed his patrons to occupy the establishment to full capacity.

In NY State, we are required by law to conduct inspections annually in places of assembly. This has been a good thing for the safety of people using buildings, and even for the economy from work generated by the defects noted during the inspection process.
 
bth0mas20 said:
He said for me to fix it and make them pay for it and he would back me up on it.
Click to expand...
Sounds like a verbal contract with the inspector? I don't know. This one is a little hairy in the contract department. Who's paying you to come up with this list? If someone way paying me to look this place over and develop a list of items for correction, I'd only actually do the work when an agreement between me and the person actually paying the bill has been completed.
 
Fred
It is hard to say from reading the OP's post what actually brought the inspector to the site in the first place. If it was an annual inspection that is one thing. Handling the issue for violations and having the contractor come up with the list of necessary corrections does not sound kosher to me.

Yes we do have both sides of the coin to deal with - shady inspectors and shady property owners. I really could not say which is worse. :D
 
Plus, who's to say that it's stricly just electrical violations that are problems here. It also could include other issues, such as egress, fire supression, flammable materials, sanitation, health, noise, liquor licensing, etc. Playing the electrical card may just be one in the entire hand they are trying to play against the place.
 
They are doing the paperwork to lessen the amount of people allowed to 97.

Also, The deputy inspector is not the electrical inspector. He is the lead inspector for all fields and he works close with the fire marshall. I just came from thier and worked for 4.5 hrs. I had a helper with me. I got a check today from them to cover my time, my helps time, and the materials I used today. I will work on this job for about 8 more hours to finish. He has paid me up so far. I will call for inspection on friday and If it passes I will be paid the rest of the money. Im not concerned about that. I require a certin amount up front before I touch a tool.

Every problem that I find I have reviewed it with the owner and he has agreed to let me fix it. Thier have been no issues with money so far.
 
480sparky said:
Plus, who's to say that it's stricly just electrical violations that are problems here. It also could include other issues, such as egress, fire supression, flammable materials, sanitation, health, noise, liquor licensing, etc. Playing the electrical card may just be one in the entire hand they are trying to play against the place.
Click to expand...


Electrical is not the only problem.

Building, plumbing, and health all need sign offs before business can start again.
 
bth0mas20 said:
Electrical is not the only problem.

Building, plumbing, and health all need sign offs before business can start again.
Click to expand...

I got involved in one of those years ago. Liquor license was hanging by a thread. Fire Marshal allowed them to stay open as long as progress was being completed in a reasonable amount of time. He would be on the site about every other day checking on things, and asking all the subs what they were doing and how long it would take.

Then out of the blue, they closed up. :mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top