|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
The article is 250.30(A). Regrounding past the point of grounding. The jumper at the transformer is the point of grounding, anything past that point should be isolated. The sketch is something i created.
Rick
__________________
If I can't fix it, it's not broke. |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
From Allen-Bradley Pub. 1770-4.1
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
I see in the AB drawing they require a connnection to an electrode where the NEC allows the incoming equipment ground in place of the electrode.
Rick
__________________
If I can't fix it, it's not broke. |
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
|
Isn't ising the equipment ground in effect connecting to an electrode?
|
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes it is but currently only allowed to be used with transformers 1000va or less. Why would AB require an electrode if not nec required. I don't see a significant amount of control transformers needing to be any larger than a 1000 va.
Rick
__________________
If I can't fix it, it's not broke. |
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think you missed my point. An EGC in a typical premises wiring system is in effect connected to the grounding electrode system (i.e. the EGC provides a low-impedance path to the GES).
|
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
I understood what you were saying. The equipment ground conductor is tied to the GES back at the source, but the AB drawing is calling for a "GEC". If the drawing didn't call it a GEC and just said connect it to the GES, i would agree that the equipment ground conductor is satisfying the requirement.
__________________
If I can't fix it, it's not broke. |
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
...but it appears, though not noted, the xfmr is over 1000VA and qualifies as an SDS. |
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Rick
__________________
If I can't fix it, it's not broke. |
![]() |

| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|