Go Back   Mike Holt's Forum > Grounding versus Bonding
Forgot Login Information?
Register FAQ About Moderators Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-02-2009, 10:26 AM
RUWired RUWired is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pa.
Posts: 1,780
Default

The article is 250.30(A). Regrounding past the point of grounding. The jumper at the transformer is the point of grounding, anything past that point should be isolated. The sketch is something i created.

Rick
__________________
If I can't fix it, it's not broke.
  #42  
Old 11-05-2009, 10:50 AM
dbaird dbaird is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 34
Default reply

From Allen-Bradley Pub. 1770-4.1
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 1770-4.1 page 10.pdf (36.7 KB, 22 views)
  #43  
Old 11-05-2009, 03:17 PM
RUWired RUWired is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pa.
Posts: 1,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbaird View Post
From Allen-Bradley Pub. 1770-4.1
I see in the AB drawing they require a connnection to an electrode where the NEC allows the incoming equipment ground in place of the electrode.
Rick
__________________
If I can't fix it, it's not broke.
  #44  
Old 11-05-2009, 08:36 PM
Smart $'s Avatar
Smart $ Smart $ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RUWired View Post
I see in the AB drawing they require a connnection to an electrode where the NEC allows the incoming equipment ground in place of the electrode.
Rick
Isn't ising the equipment ground in effect connecting to an electrode?
  #45  
Old 11-05-2009, 09:16 PM
RUWired RUWired is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pa.
Posts: 1,780
Default

Yes it is but currently only allowed to be used with transformers 1000va or less. Why would AB require an electrode if not nec required. I don't see a significant amount of control transformers needing to be any larger than a 1000 va.

Rick
__________________
If I can't fix it, it's not broke.
  #46  
Old 11-06-2009, 01:41 AM
Smart $'s Avatar
Smart $ Smart $ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RUWired View Post
Yes it is but currently only allowed to be used with transformers 1000va or less. Why would AB require an electrode if not nec required. I don't see a significant amount of control transformers needing to be any larger than a 1000 va.

Rick
I think you missed my point. An EGC in a typical premises wiring system is in effect connected to the grounding electrode system (i.e. the EGC provides a low-impedance path to the GES).
  #47  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:03 AM
RUWired RUWired is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pa.
Posts: 1,780
Default

I understood what you were saying. The equipment ground conductor is tied to the GES back at the source, but the AB drawing is calling for a "GEC". If the drawing didn't call it a GEC and just said connect it to the GES, i would agree that the equipment ground conductor is satisfying the requirement.
__________________
If I can't fix it, it's not broke.
  #48  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:25 AM
Smart $'s Avatar
Smart $ Smart $ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RUWired View Post
I understood what you were saying. The equipment ground conductor is tied to the GES back at the source, but the AB drawing is calling for a "GEC". If the drawing didn't call it a GEC and just said connect it to the GES, i would agree that the equipment ground conductor is satisfying the requirement.
Aye...

...but it appears, though not noted, the xfmr is over 1000VA and qualifies as an SDS.
  #49  
Old 11-06-2009, 12:03 PM
RUWired RUWired is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pa.
Posts: 1,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smart $ View Post
Aye...

...but it appears, though not noted, the xfmr is over 1000VA and qualifies as an SDS.
Looking at the rest of the publication,page 9 of 20, http://literature.rockwellautomation...n041_-en-p.pdf they are using the GEC for equal potential although the equipment ground conductor does the same.

Rick
__________________
If I can't fix it, it's not broke.
Closed Thread

CEU Banner Forum Pages

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 PM.

- Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.