Is a smoke alarm Utilization Equipment?

Status
Not open for further replies.

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
This question came up on another forum. If it is not, then dwelling unit smoke alarms would not have to be on AFCI protected circuits.
 

Little Bill

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Tennessee NEC:2017
Occupation
Semi-Retired Electrician
This question came up on another forum. If it is not, then dwelling unit smoke alarms would not have to be on AFCI protected circuits.

I would say so according to this:

Utilization Equipment. Equipment that utilizes electric
energy for electronic, electromechanical, chemical, heating,
lighting, or similar purposes.

It uses electric energy for electronic purposes.

Edit: I don't see the term "utilization equipment" in the definition or requirements for AFCI. At least not in the 2008.
 
Last edited:

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
....

Edit: I don't see the term "utilization equipment" in the definition or requirements for AFCI. At least not in the 2008.
The rule says that the branch circuits that serve "outlets" must have AFCI protection. The definition of "outlet" says that is the point where power is taken to supply utilization equipment.
 

gadfly56

Senior Member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Professional Engineer, Fire & Life Safety
The rule says that the branch circuits that serve "outlets" must have AFCI protection. The definition of "outlet" says that is the point where power is taken to supply utilization equipment.

Didn't we do this dance here at least once already?
 

raider1

Senior Member
Staff member
Location
Logan, Utah
IMHO Yes, a smoke alarm is Utilization Equipment as defined in Article 100.

A smoke alarm utilizes electrical energy to power an electronic circuit that detects small particles of combustion in the air to determine if a fire is present and then acts to announce the presence of a fire to the occupants of the building.

The J-box where the smoke alarm is connected would be an outlet.

Chris
 

Gregg Harris

Senior Member
Location
Virginia
Occupation
Electrical,HVAC, Technical Trainer
IMHO Yes, a smoke alarm is Utilization Equipment as defined in Article 100.

A smoke alarm utilizes electrical energy to power an electronic circuit that detects small particles of combustion in the air to determine if a fire is present and then acts to announce the presence of a fire to the occupants of the building.

The J-box where the smoke alarm is connected would be an outlet.

Chris

I would agree
 

jumper

Senior Member
IMHO Yes, a smoke alarm is Utilization Equipment as defined in Article 100.

A smoke alarm utilizes electrical energy to power an electronic circuit that detects small particles of combustion in the air to determine if a fire is present and then acts to announce the presence of a fire to the occupants of the building.

The J-box where the smoke alarm is connected would be an outlet.

Chris

I would agree

I will agree also, but mostly because Chris smarter than me and rarely wrong, a freebie.:D
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
Goldy, reread that sentence, it could easily be misconstrued.
A marvelous book (Science Made Stupid) describes the Scientific Method and the difference between inductive and deductive methods as follows:
(non-copyright violating paraphrase, for educational purposes.)

In the Inductive Method, you
A. Formulate a hypothesis.
B. Get a grant.
C. Perform the experiment.
D. Analyse the results and change the data to support your hypothesis.

In the Deductive Method (which I favor), you
A. Formulate a hypothesis.
B. Get a grant.
C. Perform the experiment.
D. Analyze the results and change and backdate your hypothesis to match the observed result.
 
Last edited:

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
I tend to agree that the smoke alarms are utilization equipment, but have argued the opposite for industrial instrumentation for the purposes of the Exception to 501.30(B).

Is "power utilization equipment" different from "utilization equipment"?
 

jumper

Senior Member
Goldy, let me clarify: Your previous statement could mean that if you are "proved wrong" it was because somebody "misunderstood" what you were saying.

Let me edit the clauses a bit different:

"Whenever I am proved wrong,..... I was just misunderstood. "

A bit clearer?
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
Goldy, let me clarify: Your previous statement could mean that if you are "proved wrong" it was because somebody "misunderstood" what you were saying.

Let me edit the clauses a bit different:

"Whenever I am proved wrong,..... I was just misunderstood. "

A bit clearer?
Yes but not at all what I intended to say. :)

My preferred paraphrase would be:

"Whenever I appear to have been proven wrong....I was just misunderstood initially."

However, for enhanced sarcastic emphasis, I chose to state it in a(n apparently) self-contradictory way. :angel:
If in fact I actually ever said that.
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
Without me delving into 501, what is your reference/UL section/etc for such a distinction?
The exeption I cited uses those words.
(B) Types of Equipment Grounding Conductors. Flexible metal conduit and liquidtight flexible metal conduit shall include an equipment bonding jumper of the wire type in compliance with 250.102.
Exception: In Class I, Division 2 locations, the bonding jumper shall be permitted to be deleted where all of the following conditions are met:
(1) Listed liquidtight flexible metal conduit 1.8 m (6 ft) or less in length, with fittings listed for grounding, is used.
(2) Overcurrent protection in the circuit is limited to 10 amperes or less.
(3) The load is not a power utilization load.
It has been a common practice around here to use the LFMC as the EGC for 120 volt powered instrumentation.
 

jumper

Senior Member
The exeption I cited uses those words.

It has been a common practice around here to use the LFMC as the EGC for 120 volt powered instrumentation.


Well, I am out of my league here, hazardous locations are not my forte, that why I asked for clarification. I would have assumed non powered utilization equipment something like a thermistor or such.:ashamed1:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top