A/A Fuel GTX
Senior Member
- Location
- WI & AZ
- Occupation
- Electrician
Or wrap the tie wrap around both MC's and then through the staple.
By the letter of the law, yes.That would make it right?.
I agree with you. As long as the MC is not in danger what difference it make. That is why I added the line admitting I have done the same thing.I don't see the difference although I don't disagree with you. I'm thinking the real reason for 300.11 is to prevent someone from using back to back Minnies from one conduit to support another. I do the tie wrap thing with Romex all the time and never get called for it. Same principle here with the MC but I don't do much commercial so I thought I'd see what the consensus is. BTW, what's a Colorado Jim?
Finally we get at least one thing named after my state. I wish I was the Coloradan that came up with them.I just Googled the " Colorado Jim". Nice idea......
How do you get Slim out of J?"Colorado Slim" is their brother; Erico Caddy CJ6
In this case the "supported" part is not critical but the "secured" part is.I would never reject that install in that situation. There is no weight added to the other mc because all you are doing is keeping it from moving out of the stud space. Technically the inspector may be correct but IMO its a bad call.
In this case the "supported" part is not critical but the "secured" part is.
"Colorado Slim" is their brother; Erico Caddy CJ6