User Tag List

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: UL Listed Terminal Blocks

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    9,916
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tom baker View Post
    A recognized component can only be used by a panel mfg or UL shop.
    I don't believe that is absolutely true. Field installation is allowed.

    According to the White Book: " Many UL investigations of equipment involve an evaluation of the suitability of components such as relays, thermostats, switches, etc. for specific applications. Where such components are designed to comply with all the construction and performance requirements of the category, they are eligible for UL Listing and suitable for either field or factory installation."
    However it also goes on to say:
    "The Recognized Component Mark does not provide evidence of listing or labeling, which maybe required by installation codes or standards"
    Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    South of Bawstin
    Posts
    1,257
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Power Distribution Blocks (PDB) used in junction boxes are required to be listed according to 314.28(E)(1) and when used in a wireway 376.56(B)(1)

    Field installed PDB's require covers over live parts.

    UL recognized parts are not for field installation, except for a direct replacement.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Northern illinois
    Posts
    16,998
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by shortcircuit2 View Post
    UL recognized parts are not for field installation, except for a direct replacement.
    The code does not require that at all.

    In fact many parts are not required to be listed.
    Bob

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A little background, most people have heard about the UL Recognized Component Mark but few have actually read what UL says it is for.
    UL RECOGNIZED COMPONENT MARK
    UL Component Recognition means that UL has evaluated components or materials intended for use in a complete product or system. These components are intended only for end-use products that may be eligible for UL certification.

    The UL Recognized Component is a shortcut for manufacturers. If you are a manufacturer building some type of equipment you can make it easier and cheaper to list if you use UL Recognized Components in the equipment because they are already tested and do not need to be retested.

    Anyone can use components with a UL Recognized Component Mark, no law against it. But putting together a bunch of UL Recognized components does not create a UL Recognized Component or a UL Listed device unless the assembly is done under the direction of a manufacturer who has got a UL Listing for a device that is assembled out of UL Recognized components in the field. If someone uses a component to make up something in the field like a transition box the UL Recognized Component Mark just becomes meaningless.

    One thing to keep in mind is that the NEC does not specifically require that every electrical device is UL Listed but NEC 110.2 does require that all, "conductors and equipment required or permitted by this Code shall be acceptable only if approved," and many AHJs rather than take on the responsibility of approving equipment themselves, as defined in 110.3, will require the use of a UL Listed device if it is available. If there is a UL Listed device for performing transitions an AHJ can require that it be used based on the NEC.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Clinton, WA
    Posts
    90
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am still hoping to hear how others are transitioning from PV wire to THWN-2 at the roof in residential systems. I have "wire nuts" from JaggedBen. Anyone else?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Cherry Valley NY, Seattle, WA
    Posts
    4,934
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PWDickerson View Post
    I am still hoping to hear how others are transitioning from PV wire to THWN-2 at the roof in residential systems. I have "wire nuts" from JaggedBen. Anyone else?
    How about a mechanical butt splicer?
    Ethan Brush - East West Electric. NY, WA. MA

    "You can't generalize"

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    northeast
    Posts
    106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PWDickerson View Post
    I am still hoping to hear how others are transitioning from PV wire to THWN-2 at the roof in residential systems. I have "wire nuts" from JaggedBen. Anyone else?
    Local AHJ's in my area do not allow wire nuts, so we use insulated connectors like Burndy BIBD type.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,779
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by csoc64 View Post
    Local AHJ's in my area do not allow wire nuts, so we use insulated connectors like Burndy BIBD type.
    I'm sorry to see they are costing you so much money.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    23,851
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by petersonra View Post
    The code does not require terminal blocks be listed.

    An inspector cannot require they be listed UNLESS the AHJ had made a local amendment to that effect.
    The AHJ has to approve all equipment used in an installation. Often they base their approval on a listing if there is a listed product available.
    Don, Illinois
    (All code citations are 2017 unless otherwise noted)

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Clinton, WA
    Posts
    90
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We usually use Burndy clear tap's when we do a line-side connect or feeder tap. They make a very solid splice, but when used for the DC splice, they take up a lot of room in a j-box, and they are expensive. I was hoping to find some ideas for an equally solid, more compact, and less expensive solution.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •