# Thread: Do I need a bigger ground wire?

1. Senior Member
Join Date
Dec 2008
Posts
252
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged

## Do I need a bigger ground wire?

In order to lower the voltage drop, I am increasing my conductors from size 4/0. To 350 MCM. Is it OK to leave the neutral at 4/0 and leave the ground wire at number two. All the Wires are aluminum.

2. Senior Member
Join Date
Aug 2004
Location
Northern illinois
Posts
17,422
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
You can leave the neutral wire as is.

The EGC has to be increased in size IMO.

3. You don't need any "ground wires" but you do need an EGC.

The EGC needs to be increased in size by the same proportion as the ungrounded conductors which went from #4/0 to 350 kcmil. Once you figure out that ratio you would increase the EGC accordingly.

4. Senior Member
Join Date
Dec 2008
Posts
252
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
Looking at 250.122 the EGC is sized based on the circuit breaker. Example: for 200 amp, #2 Alum is required.
It is not based on the size of the wire used for the ungrounded conductors.
So even if I used 500 mcm with a 200 amp circuit breaker, I think I could still use #2 grounding. Do you all agree?
As for the neutral, do I need to show calculations for reducing the size of the neutral, or does voltage drop not apply to the neutral?

5. Senior Member
Join Date
Apr 2006
Location
Springfield, MA, USA
Posts
3,543
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
Look at the next part of the section.

The _first_ step is selecting an EGC based on the size of the breaker.

_Next_ if the ungrounded conductors are increased in size (relative to what they would normally be on that breaker) then you must also increase the size of the EGC.

We have had huge threads about just what the normal size conductor is, but if we take your opening post at face value you would normally have a 4/0 conductor on the breaker, but you are using a 350 kcmil conductor instead. So
step 1: find the egc based on the breaker
step 2: look up its area
step 3: multiply this by the area ratio from 350 kcmil to 4/0 awg,
step 4: find a conductor with this (or larger) new area

-Jon

6. Senior Member
Join Date
Dec 2008
Posts
252
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
I stated the question incorrectly.

I have to run wire from house to barn and well. It will be a 200 amp circuit with aluminum wire 4/0 4/0 4/0 and #2 EGC.

I have some 350 MCM wire which I will use for the two hot wires. Since it is larger wire it will work even better and I assume that I can leave the other wires the same. Will this be OK with the inspector?

7. Originally Posted by mlnk
I stated the question incorrectly.

I have to run wire from house to barn and well. It will be a 200 amp circuit with aluminum wire 4/0 4/0 4/0 and #2 EGC.

I have some 350 MCM wire which I will use for the two hot wires. Since it is larger wire it will work even better and I assume that I can leave the other wires the same. Will this be OK with the inspector?
The inspector should cite this:

250.122(B) Increased in Size. Where ungrounded conductors are
increased in size
from the minimum size that has sufficient
ampacity for the intended installation, wire-type equipment
grounding conductors, where installed, shall be increased in
size proportionately according to the circular mil area of
the ungrounded conductors

8. Originally Posted by mlnk
In order to lower the voltage drop, I am increasing my conductors from size 4/0. To 350 MCM. Is it OK to leave the neutral at 4/0 and leave the ground wire at number two. All the Wires are aluminum.
How much neutral current is expected? Can be smaller than 4/0 if neutral is well balanced and never sees much load. Can never be smaller than minimum required EGC though on a feeder or min SSBJ for service conductor.

9. Senior Member
Join Date
Nov 2015
Location
CA, USA
Posts
755
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
Originally Posted by mlnk
I stated the question incorrectly.

I have to run wire from house to barn and well. It will be a 200 amp circuit with aluminum wire 4/0 4/0 4/0 and #2 EGC.

I have some 350 MCM wire which I will use for the two hot wires. Since it is larger wire it will work even better and I assume that I can leave the other wires the same. Will this be OK with the inspector?
Unfortunately, even if you are using larger conductor just because you have a spool of it around you still have to increase the EGC size. The idea is that the EGC is sized to the OCPD rating and the assumed conductor size that the OCPD would normally be paired with. Using a larger conductor reduces the resistance in the circuit which will increase the fault current the EGC has to carry and the EGC can act as a choke point for the ground fault current increasing the time it takes for the OCPD to operate. Using a larger EGC will account for this.

10. Originally Posted by pv_n00b
Unfortunately, even if you are using larger conductor just because you have a spool of it around you still have to increase the EGC size. The idea is that the EGC is sized to the OCPD rating and the assumed conductor size that the OCPD would normally be paired with. Using a larger conductor reduces the resistance in the circuit which will increase the fault current the EGC has to carry and the EGC can act as a choke point for the ground fault current increasing the time it takes for the OCPD to operate. Using a larger EGC will account for this.
It is not a perfect rule either, it is the best they could come up with for a one size fits all type of rule. Some installations it makes sense, others it is overkill.

Some installations where conductor isn't "upsized" but is a long run, you will have much slower response of OCPD if there is a short circuit or ground fault even though you are in compliance with conductor sizing - resistance of conductor is going to be current limiting.

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•