# Thread: Ambient Temperature Correction Factor

1. Junior Member
Join Date
Oct 2018
Location
Hemet ca
Posts
6
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged

## Ambient Temperature Correction Factor

I am new to the forum and I'm studying for the California electrical exam. I was wondering if any could explain when to divide and when to multiple the correction factor by the amperage? I have been doing either or witch ever gives me the correct answer but in the real world I won't have possible answers in front of me.

2. Senior Member
Join Date
Dec 2011
Location
Wisconsin
Posts
661
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
Originally Posted by James14
I am new to the forum and I'm studying for the California electrical exam. I was wondering if any could explain when to divide and when to multiple the correction factor by the amperage? I have been doing either or witch ever gives me the correct answer but in the real world I won't have possible answers in front of me.

You always multiply by the value given in table 310.15(B)(2)(b) for ambient temperature correction. For example: 2 AWG copper XHHW has an ampacity of 115. You are going to use it in an ambient temperature of 115 degrees F. 115 X .85 (the value in the table) = 97.75 amperes. The ampacity of 2 AWG XHHW copper used when the ambient temp is 115 degrees is 97.75 amps.

3. Junior Member
Join Date
Oct 2018
Location
Hemet ca
Posts
6
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
Correction Factor for 36° C =.88 in the 75° column of table 310.15(b)(2)(a). 45 amps ÷ .88 =51 witch require a #6 conductor but if multiple it you get 39.6 or 40 witch is wrong am I not correct?

4. Junior Member
Join Date
Oct 2018
Location
Hemet ca
Posts
6
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
The question reads what size conductor, Type THW cu.,can supply a 45 amp load when the ambient temperature is 36°c? Terminals are rated for 75°c. The answer #6 AWG

5. Junior Member
Join Date
Oct 2018
Location
Hemet ca
Posts
6
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
Does anyone know when to multiple and when to divide?

6. Senior Member
Join Date
Jan 2016
Location
nj
Posts
224
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
Originally Posted by James14
Correction Factor for 36° C =.88 in the 75° column of table 310.15(b)(2)(a). 45 amps ÷ .88 =51 witch require a #6 conductor but if multiple it you get 39.6 or 40 witch is wrong am I not correct?
I think you're missing the point of the question.

If it is too hot or cold, the wire is no longer good for it's rating in 310.15. The correction factor is a percentage. Table 310.15 tells you what each conductor is rated for at an ambient temperature of 60C, 75C, and 90C. If the temperature changes, the ampacity will change as a result.

So, a #6 in a 35C environment is only rated for 88% of the value listed in the 75C column. 88% of 65A is 57.2A (0.88*65 = 57.2A).

What this ultimately means is that a #6 in a 35C environment can only carry 57.2A. If you need 60A protection, you are no longer allowed to use a #6 because it is now rated for 57.2A. In a 35C environment, a 60A load would need #4 feeders.

Another thing to note; you have to apply this adjustment twice if the wire is on a roof and at a different temperature than what is tabulated in 310.15.

7. Senior Member
Join Date
May 2018
Location
Jamaica and london
Posts
1,306
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
Originally Posted by jeremy.zinkofsky

Another thing to note; you have to apply this adjustment twice if the wire is on a roof and at a different temperature than what is tabulated in 310.15.
I thought you had to figure which temperature situation gave you the biggest difference factor, or worst case, and set your correction figures for that? You might calculate losses such that one part of cable is 57 amps and another part of cable is 59 amps but you use the 57 amps because that is lowest figure? Or am I reading the calculations hints wrong? Instructor was saying you could, due to conditions, have fice calculations on different factors, but then you choose worst case and adapt for that one.

8. Senior Member
Join Date
Jan 2016
Location
nj
Posts
224
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
I thought you had to figure which temperature situation gave you the biggest difference factor, or worst case, and set your correction figures for that? You might calculate losses such that one part of cable is 57 amps and another part of cable is 59 amps but you use the 57 amps because that is lowest figure? Or am I reading the calculations hints wrong? Instructor was saying you could, due to conditions, have fice calculations on different factors, but then you choose worst case and adapt for that one.
That might be over analyzing a bit. I have always looked at historical temperatures for the area and applied the closest temp correction factor.

9. Senior Member
Join Date
May 2013
Location
Massachusetts
Posts
2,468
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
Originally Posted by James14
Does anyone know when to multiple and when to divide?
The NEC specifies the calculation problem of "given a certain wire at conditions of use, what is the ampacity?". If you plug-and-chug an equation directly according to the way the NEC specifies how to calculate ampacity, you would multiply by a temperature correction factor. So given #6 Cu THWN-2 wire with an 0.96 temperature correction factor, the wire ampacity is 75A*0.96.

In a design problem, your calculation is instead, "given an operating current and conditions of use, what wire size should be used?". This is the inverse problem of what the NEC directly prescribes, and therefore when you rearrange it with algebra, you get division instead of multiplication.

You will get both of these questions on an exam. So it is a matter of which direction your calculation goes.

As an example, 56A operating current at 32C ambient. One calculation I would do, is 56A/0.96 = 58.3A. Then take 58.3A, and look it up in the 90C column of the ampacity table. It is between the value for #8 and #6, and thus we round up to #6. There are more calculations that govern whether this is a sufficient size for a specific situation (terminal ratings, 240.4(B) ocpd, etc), but leave that for another topic.

10. See if this helps. A conductor's ampacity is based on its ability to endure the heat that will be created as current passes through the wire, without sustaining damage to its insulation system. A bigger wire has a higher ampacity because the same amount of current releases less heat (i.e., given that the larger wire has lower resistance). But to the present point, the hotter a wire gets, the greater the potential degradation of the insulation. If you run 40 amps through a wire in an ambient temperature environment of 30C, the insulation will reach some temperature. If you run the same current though the same wire in a hotter environment, the insulation will reach a higher temperature. To reduce the chances of damage to the insulation when the ambient temperature is higher, you have to reduce the amount of current you run through the wire. The temperature adjustment factors are all below 1.0 for temperatures above 30C. You multiply the ampacity in the table by the adjustment factor, and the resulting ampacity is lower than the tabulated value.

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•