Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Conduit supports on metal roofs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Massachusetts, MA
    Posts
    1

    Conduit supports on metal roofs

    If you are installing IMC conduit for PV DC source circuits for long runs on a large standing seam metal roof (commercial), should you use conduit support straps that allow the conduit to move within the strap (for thermal expansion/contraction) if the support is attached to the roof via a standing seam clip, or should the strap be tight fitted so that there is no movement allowed (assuming the conduit and the roof expand/contract at the same rate)?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    683
    Shouldn't the movement be allowed for by using conduit expansion joints? NEC 342 requires that IMC be securely fastened but does not say anything about allowing for expansion. Unlike PVC where it calls out the requirements. It's up to the contractor to determine if expansion will be an issue and plan accordingly.
    Last edited by pv_n00b; 10-30-18 at 09:59 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    119
    You might want to consider a support block type. Allows for slight movement and no roof penetrations. Keeps it above the roof so it runs considerably cooler.

    http://www.eaton.com/us/en-us/catalo...-supports.html

    https://www.cableorganizer.com/arlington-industries/roof-topper-conduit-support/

    https://www.mifab.com/Catalog/C-PORT_Roof_Pipe_Supports

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Clark County, NV
    Posts
    1,424
    Quote Originally Posted by pv_n00b View Post
    Shouldn't the movement be allowed for by using conduit expansion joints? ...
    Expansion joints eat up and release conduit as it expands or contracts. They don't help its displacement relative to the roof surface. Or am I picturing the question wrongly?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    3 Hr 2 Min from Winged Horses
    Posts
    15,950
    Quote Originally Posted by pv_n00b View Post
    Shouldn't the movement be allowed for by using conduit expansion joints? NEC 342 requires that IMC be securely fastened but does not say anything about allowing for expansion. Unlike PVC where it calls out the requirements. It's up to the contractor to determine if expansion will be an issue and plan accordingly.
    See 300.7(B) and the Index for other applicable code sections.
    "Electricity is really just organized lightning." George Carlin


    Derek

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Cherry Valley NY, Seattle, WA
    Posts
    4,843
    Quote Originally Posted by JpSolar View Post
    If you are installing IMC conduit for PV DC source circuits for long runs on a large standing seam metal roof (commercial), should you use conduit support straps that allow the conduit to move within the strap (for thermal expansion/contraction) if the support is attached to the roof via a standing seam clip, or should the strap be tight fitted so that there is no movement allowed (assuming the conduit and the roof expand/contract at the same rate)?
    IMO no expansion joint is needed. Not only is the IMC and roofing the same material so it will expand at the same rate, the standing seem clips will have plenty of flex anyway.
    Ethan Brush - East West Electric. NY, WA. MA

    "You can't generalize"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    2,421
    Quote Originally Posted by MAC702 View Post
    Expansion joints eat up and release conduit as it expands or contracts. They don't help its displacement relative to the roof surface. Or am I picturing the question wrongly?
    On a related note about thermal expansion planning. A lot of PV rail systems specify expansion joints, yet rigidly fasten each support point to the structure below. It would appear that this doesn't allow the expansion joint do its job, if the run is only able to freely expand and contract in one span length, while 9 spans out of 10 are rigidly bolted at both ends.

    Yes, standing seam systems can flex a little at each L-foot/attachment, but systems rigidly bolted to a beam system or rafters cannot do the same.

    Does anyone else understand how this is supposed to work?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Clark County, NV
    Posts
    1,424
    Quote Originally Posted by electrofelon View Post
    ...Not only is the IMC and roofing the same material so it will expand at the same rate...
    I would not have expected that. There is a small difference in the type of steel used, but there is a huge difference in material shape and volume or cross-section, and a huge difference in heat sinks.

    Steel roofing seems to be completely fastened to prevent any expansion movement. My limited experience with steel roofing is residential, and it's simply screwed down every couple feet.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Austin, TX, USA
    Posts
    10,191
    Quote Originally Posted by MAC702 View Post
    I would not have expected that. There is a small difference in the type of steel used, but there is a huge difference in material shape and volume or cross-section, and a huge difference in heat sinks.

    Steel roofing seems to be completely fastened to prevent any expansion movement. My limited experience with steel roofing is residential, and it's simply screwed down every couple feet.
    Some larger metal roofs are secured with "T" shaped clips that allow the roof to move through them as it expands and contracts. They are troublesome to mount solar on because you cannot put an S-5 clip on top of or very near a roofing clip because compressing the seam at that point can restrict the movement of the roof.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    683
    Quote Originally Posted by MAC702 View Post
    Expansion joints eat up and release conduit as it expands or contracts. They don't help its displacement relative to the roof surface. Or am I picturing the question wrongly?
    In theory, the conduit mount can take a certain amount of force from the expansion and contraction of the conduit without movement or damage. When the amount of force exceeds a given point the mount will be damaged or pulled out of the roof. The amount of force due to expansion is related to the length of the conduit and the temperature change. The temperature change and length of the conduit run will dictate the number of expansion joints required. The NEC does not provide a table for IMC so you have to do it on your own. You can get the expansion in length per deg from the conduit manufacturer. The NEC does not give a requirement for how much change in length is allowed for IMC, but the 1/4" given for PVC is probably not a bad number or get a number from the conduit mount manufacturer.


    To bring it all together, get a temperature change range for the site, using that and the change in conduit length per deg, find the length of conduit you can have where you get maximum change in length you are designing for. That's the longest straight run you can have before you put in an expansion joint.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •