User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: please evaluate this statement

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Cherry Valley NY, Seattle, WA
    Posts
    4,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldDigger View Post
    IMHO the only claim to measurable superiority that Sunpower can offer is a higher energy production per unit area of panel. And it is not impossible (although hard) to imagine an installation where mounting space is at a premium and a specific total energy target must be met. That would be the only case in in which the Sunpower "superiority" would have a direct benefit that could influence the panel choice.
    I agree that efficiency is a reason one could claim "premium" panels. That is probably often used as a marketing ploy, since many consumers dont understand that "watts are watts"

    I just wasnt sure if maybe there were some panels that did a little better in low light for example, for the same max power rating.
    Ethan Brush - East West Electric. NY, WA. MA

    "You can't generalize"

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Placerville, CA, USA
    Posts
    19,856
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by electrofelon View Post
    ...
    ...
    I just wasnt sure if maybe there were some panels that did a little better in low light for example, for the same max power rating.
    Not that I am aware of.
    Some claims have been made for thin panels (amorphous active ingredient) being better in low light, but I suspect what is being anecdotally reported as better in low light may actually be better in partial shade.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jaggedben View Post
    Yes, there are some crap modules, probably especially in other countries. But there aren't premium ones, at least not in terms of production vs nameplate. You are correct to group Sunpower with 'other Tier 1 modules'. And practically nobody, to my knowledge, is trying to sell crap modules to residential customers in the US.

    My point is basically that when it comes to energy production, all modules from reputable companies with 25 year performance guarantees can be assessed on a level playing field of nameplate, efficiency and price. Sunpower has over and over tried to claim to consumers that their product is somehow in a special category of its own and that it 'produces more energy', with the implication that it produces more for the same nameplate. What electrofelon quoted is a classic example, designed to mislead the less knowledgeable. It's just not true, and they don't even have higher nameplates than everyone else anymore.

    To be fair, my company sells some higher efficiency lines as 'premium', based on appearance, fewer roof penetrations, company reputation, etc. ... but we don't make bogus claims about energy production vs nameplate.
    I definitely agree, the term "premium" has no legal definition and can mean anything a marketer wants it to mean. It's like the term "fresh" when applied to produce, it has no legal definition. Unlike "organic" which has a legal definition and if the producer does not meet the requirments, they can't use the term.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by electrofelon View Post
    I agree that efficiency is a reason one could claim "premium" panels. That is probably often used as a marketing ploy, since many consumers dont understand that "watts are watts"

    I just wasnt sure if maybe there were some panels that did a little better in low light for example, for the same max power rating.

    Thin film cells have a different response to insolation than crystalline cells. They can produce more energy in diffuse and low lighting conditions and they tend to have better temperature response. This has been validated. Whether this will produce more annual energy depends on the conditions at the site.

    Keep in mind that STC is a specific set of test conditions. The amount of isolation, temperature, flash time, etc. It provides comparable results for only those specific conditions, same for PTC. Different cell types might have very different responses over the range of conditions they are exposed to in the field that might result in modules with the exact same STC power rating producing different amounts of energy over the year. Don't make the mistake of assuming that an STC rating is also a rating for annual energy production.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Cherry Valley NY, Seattle, WA
    Posts
    4,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Its frustrating how every solar proposal I have seen is skewed to the optimistic side. This one I was looking over for a friend: 1) Looks like the annual production is 10-15% high based on a quick PV watts run through 2) they claimed 20% more production because of micro inverters and "premium panels" (and #1 is after correcting for this) 3) They did 'ye old "electricity prices rise x% every year lie" (electricty prices have in fact not kept up with inflation over the last several decades). Just annoys me, I like solar but I hate this lying.
    Ethan Brush - East West Electric. NY, WA. MA

    "You can't generalize"

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Austin, TX, USA
    Posts
    10,282
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One thing about SunPower modules that I think is unique to them is that they make electrical contact with the front surface of the module through what we used to refer to in the semiconductor bidness as "buried contacts" from the back side, so there is no shading from conductors running across the front of the module.

    Full disclosure: the company I work for is a SunPower dealer. I won't get onto either side of a SunPower bashing debate.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,775
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ggunn View Post
    One thing about SunPower modules that I think is unique to them is that they make electrical contact with the front surface of the module through what we used to refer to in the semiconductor bidness as "buried contacts" from the back side, so there is no shading from conductors running across the front of the module.

    Full disclosure: the company I work for is a SunPower dealer. I won't get onto either side of a SunPower bashing debate.
    It's no longer unique. LG is doing it now, too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •