acrwc10 said:What if it were 220 volt with no neutral?
210.25 not withstanding, would solve some of the issues since the switched ungrounded conductors would be electrically isolated.
acrwc10 said:What if it were 220 volt with no neutral?
benaround said:Kzoo,
What happens when both houses have their switchs on? Does the smart
controler have instructions on how it should be wired? Is it made to be used
by two seperate dwellings.
kzoo said:It is made to have two seperate power sources. Technically speaking, it switches houses on pump use I think. i.e. pump cycle #1 is powered by house A, pump cycle #2 is powered by house B.
acrwc10 said:so if house A uses 10 times the water then house B gets "hosed" on the power bill.
kzoo said:Also, since it's not a multiple structure under single management as someone else mentioned would I be correct in that 210.4 prohibits the tied together neutral and tied together ground scenario, in addition to others that I haven't considered?
iwire said:210.4 does not have anything to do with EGCs and I don't see how 210.4 has anything to do with the neutrals.
iwire said:I gave you a code section that prohibits the neutrals being tied together.
250.24(A)(5).