inspector

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shockedby277v

Senior Member
Location
Michigan
Gotcha ;) After you pointed it out I noticed the heading.

I did catch this of that graphic though.

""Author?s Comment: It was not the intent of this rule to apply to multiwire branch circuits, because a multiwire branch circuit is considered as one circuit [100]. However, many will take the opportunity to apply this rule to multiwire circuits. ""

http://www.mikeholt.com/PopGraphic.php?id=1252
 

ryan_618

Senior Member
Only 2 comments were submitted to this proposal. One was mine (rejected), the other was accpeted to continue the "accept in principal" action from the ROP. I see no way this is going to change.
 

roger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Fl
Occupation
Retired Electrician
jwelectric said:
It is going to be cold tonight Roger.

I can see both sides of this propsoal both good and bad.

Mike, I can too.

I just see the headaches along with the wasted resources associated with it in hospitals, which as you know is my normal playground.

Roger
 

jwelectric

Senior Member
Location
North Carolina
roger said:
Mike, I can too.

I just see the headaches along with the wasted resources associated with it in hospitals, which as you know is my normal playground.

Roger

One room fed with three multiwire circuits would require that the room be shut down in the event that one circuit needs to be opened.

Big problem
 

GeorgeB

ElectroHydraulics engineer (retired)
Location
Greenville SC
Occupation
Retired
roger said:
George, the OP does in fact have a MWBC.

Roger

I stand corrected; I read it that the panel was fed with 3 phase but individual circuits were line/gc/egc ... not what he said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top