jaylectricity
Senior Member
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Occupation
- licensed journeyman electrician
Inspector showed up to inspect my generator and ATS install. He saw the yard sign of the guy who sells and services the equipment and assumed I was operating as that business. Demanded (via online portal) a license with that business name and liability and workman's comp for that business name.
I replied that the business he was referring to was my customer, not me.
He tagged me for the following:
Didn't use listed support for SER cable (I used a strap To hang it from a joist it was passing under)
Equipment grounding conductor requires listed fittings (I think he means grounding electrode conductor that I passed through the connector with the SER, because the equipment grounding conductor is part of the SER)
Surge protection required when replacing service (I didn't replace the service or any of the existing equipment, I added a transfer switch)
Unistrut driven into frozen ground does not constitute a support for conduit (I drove superstrut 30 inches into the ground to support 24" of 1.25" PVC that stuck out from the building)
Maybe he has a couple code violations there, but he's the first to point out any of them. Can't help wonder if he just got infuriated thinking I was somehow trying to trick the town with my journeyman license even though I was running a business that requires a Masters license. MA allows journeyman to work for themselves under their own name.
According to Article 334 the only type of support that is required to be listed is wire ties. The unistrut isn't going anywhere. I suppose I should have punched a separate 1/2" KO for the GEC, but that he has the terminology wrong makes it hard to take him seriously.
This is the first inspector to interpret the new 2020 surge protection requirement to apply to adding a generator and transfer switch.
Any thoughts?
I replied that the business he was referring to was my customer, not me.
He tagged me for the following:
Didn't use listed support for SER cable (I used a strap To hang it from a joist it was passing under)
Equipment grounding conductor requires listed fittings (I think he means grounding electrode conductor that I passed through the connector with the SER, because the equipment grounding conductor is part of the SER)
Surge protection required when replacing service (I didn't replace the service or any of the existing equipment, I added a transfer switch)
Unistrut driven into frozen ground does not constitute a support for conduit (I drove superstrut 30 inches into the ground to support 24" of 1.25" PVC that stuck out from the building)
Maybe he has a couple code violations there, but he's the first to point out any of them. Can't help wonder if he just got infuriated thinking I was somehow trying to trick the town with my journeyman license even though I was running a business that requires a Masters license. MA allows journeyman to work for themselves under their own name.
According to Article 334 the only type of support that is required to be listed is wire ties. The unistrut isn't going anywhere. I suppose I should have punched a separate 1/2" KO for the GEC, but that he has the terminology wrong makes it hard to take him seriously.
This is the first inspector to interpret the new 2020 surge protection requirement to apply to adding a generator and transfer switch.
Any thoughts?