Splitting 230V and 115V on device entrance

[Bertsbolts]

Hi folks,
Just a bit of windup here. We have a boiler package unit that requires a 115/120VAC power source. In some of our packages we have an option for a 230VAC boiler pump. To accomplish this, we currently supply the boiler with two different power sources. This bugs me for various reasons.
My solution is to provide the single power source of 230VAC 1ph to the boiler, then split off the 115/120 from that connection.
Pictorial:

Fuses protect the various components after the voltage split.
This single source splitter would be inside its own enclosure inside the boiler, with the pigtails on output going where they need to.
My Question is:
Is this a doable option that keeps the wiring neater in the enclosure with the control board, electrically sound, and is it within safety concerns?

 

[Besoeker3]

My solution is to provide the single power source of 230VAC 1ph to the boiler, then split off the 115/120 from that connection.
Pictorial:

For UK and EU we have just 230Vac. It's simpler.

 

[LarryFine]

Yes, your idea is sound, safer, and is done with almost all 120/240v loads, like 3-wire major appliances.

 

[Bertsbolts]

Yes, your idea is sound, safer, and is done with almost all 120/240v loads, like 3-wire major appliances.

Thank You Larry

 

[CoolWill]

For UK and EU we have just 230Vac. It's simpler.

And? Should the guy move to the UK so he can install equipment on a single supply voltage?

 

[petersonra]

I don't have a major issue with the idea but if the instructions the manufacturer supplies tells you to use two separate supplies I would be inclined to do so. There might be some non-obvious reason for doing so.

 

[Bertsbolts]

I don't have a major issue with the idea but if the instructions the manufacturer supplies tells you to use two separate supplies I would be inclined to do so. There might be some non-obvious reason for doing so.

Instructions from boiler manufacturer are non existent for this action. We do work closely with the mfr. on any mods we want to do. Mostly to maintain warranty. In this case, they were ok with the two sources thing, relay mounted internally. I am concerned about tech safety. Having to ensure two separate power sources are off before serving thing. They are marked with a label for that, but experience tells me some don't pay attention
My reason for reaching out here is because a bean counter wants to argue that it won't work right. ☺ So backup was required. ☺ Thanks

 

[Jraef]

The caveat would be that the 240V source would HAVE TO include the neutral. If the source is a 230V 3 phase Delta system, it may not. So you would have to include SPECIFIC instructions to that effect. An alternative would be to have a single 240V input and provide a small(ish) 120V transformer inside to derive the 120V control power.

 

[petersonra]

Instructions from boiler manufacturer are non existent for this action. We do work closely with the mfr. on any mods we want to do. Mostly to maintain warranty. In this case, they were ok with the two sources thing, relay mounted internally. I am concerned about tech safety. Having to ensure two separate power sources are off before serving thing. They are marked with a label for that, but experience tells me some don't pay attention
My reason for reaching out here is because a bean counter wants to argue that it won't work right. ☺ So backup was required. ☺ Thanks

If the techs can't or won't follow the rules and shut off power and thus work live, that is a major management and supervision failure and some of those heads should roll.

 

[norcal]

For UK and EU we have just 230Vac. It's simpler.

Yeah but when your end of the world was just beginning to be wired, there was a clean slate so AEG chose 220V, Edison's 110V was already a legacy system & Tesla & Westinghouse had to match it. Big difference & agree it's simpler to deal with 400/230V.

 

[Besoeker3]

Yeah but when your end of the world was just beginning to be wired,

The first electric lights for a house in the UK were lit in 1878

Thomas Edison​

In 1879, the American inventor Thomas Edison was finally able to produce a reliable, long-lasting electric light bulb in his laboratory.

So, not much different.

 

[CoolWill]

The first electric lights for a house in the UK were lit in 1878

Thomas Edison​

In 1879, the American inventor Thomas Edison was finally able to produce a reliable, long-lasting electric light bulb in his laboratory.

So, not much different.

You're pretty hung up on this, huh?

 

[kwired]

I don't have a major issue with the idea but if the instructions the manufacturer supplies tells you to use two separate supplies I would be inclined to do so. There might be some non-obvious reason for doing so.

Run a feeder to a 4 or 6 circuit panel near the equipment and then run your two circuits from there? Also takes care of your disconnecting means requirements if the feeder originates away from this equipment.

 

[Besoeker3]

You're pretty hung up on this, huh?

I just prefer the much simpler approach compared you guys in the USA.

 

[CoolWill]

I just prefer the much simpler approach compared you guys in the USA.

You already live in the UK, the voltage is 240. What is there to prefer?

 

[Besoeker3]

You already live in the UK, the voltage is 240. What is there to prefer?

It is 230Vac for UK and for the European union. The USA has several different voltages like 240V and 120V.
This is for residential.

 

[CoolWill]

It is 230Vac for UK and for the European union. The USA has several different voltages like 240V and 120V.
This is for residential.

What I mean is, you have a single voltage supply, unlike our split voltage supply. You said you prefer a simpler approach, but there is no preference if there is no choice. Even if you preferred it another way, you don't have a choice. Outside of that, it doesn't matter at all because the OP is in the US and the equipment he has takes both 120 and 240 volts, so your preference for simpler systems is immaterial to the topic at hand.

 

[LarryFine]

What I mean is, you have a single voltage supply, unlike our split voltage supply. You said you prefer a simpler approach, but there is no preference if there is no choice. Even if you preferred it another way, you don't have a choice. Outside of that, it doesn't matter at all because the OP is in the US and the equipment he has takes both 120 and 240 volts, so your preference for simpler systems is immaterial to the topic at hand.

 

[tortuga]

Hi folks,
Just a bit of windup here. We have a boiler package unit that requires a 115/120VAC power source. In some of our packages we have an option for a 230VAC boiler pump. To accomplish this, we currently supply the boiler with two different power sources. This bugs me for various reasons.
My solution is to provide the single power source of 230VAC 1ph to the boiler, then split off the 115/120 from that connection.
Pictorial: View attachment 2571869

Fuses protect the various components after the voltage split.
This single source splitter would be inside its own enclosure inside the boiler, with the pigtails on output going where they need to.
My Question is:
Is this a doable option that keeps the wiring neater in the enclosure with the control board, electrically sound, and is it within safety concerns?

One problem I see is if the boiler is on a 240 delta system the installer might want to balance the load on the delta by placing the Boiler pump power on the A&B or the C&B phases that do not have 120V to ground.

 

[Besoeker3]

What I mean is, you have a single voltage supply, unlike our split voltage supply. You said you prefer a simpler approach, but there is no preference if there is no choice. Even if you preferred it another way, you don't have a choice. Outside of that, it doesn't matter at all because the OP is in the US and the equipment he has takes both 120 and 240 volts, so your preference for simpler systems is immaterial to the topic at hand.

My point was the simple approach for residential. My field is industrial and particularly variable speed drives.