• We will be performing upgrades on the forums and server over the weekend. The forums may be unavailable multiple times for up to an hour each. Thank you for your patience and understanding as we work to make the forums even better.

A/C wire size.

Daja7

Senior Member
customer has an a/c unit being installed and label says min. circ ampacity is 26 max ocp is 40. can you run #8 for unit as customer wants?
 

Daja7

Senior Member
Wrong. The MCA defines the smallest wire you can use, not the largest.
That was my point. but they said if used larger than the minimum you have to size the ground larger than the #10 that is proper for for 8. Is there something I am missing?
 

suemarkp

Senior Member
Location
Kent, WA
Occupation
Retired Engineer
Technically true, but I would hope an inspector wouldn't pull that. The next AC unit may have an MCA of 31 and now you'd be ripping out that #10 and installing #8. And you'd still have a #10 EGC in the latter case.

I must be in real trouble because the AC tech who installed mine put in #6 NM cable because he only looked at the 50A breaker and not the MCA. Now I have a smaller AC unit on that same wire with an MCA in the high 20's and a 40A breaker.
 

Daja7

Senior Member
yes that is minimum but can you use #8? someone said you cannot.
yes, actually they said you can but if you use more than minimum then the #10 ground for 8 must be upsized. I may be missing something.
 
Last edited:

wwhitney

Senior Member
Location
Berkeley, CA
Occupation
Retired
Technically true
I'm a proponent of the idea that the exception to 250.122(B) added in the 2020 NEC provides an escape clause for all the situations in which "if the load was larger, the smaller EGC would obviously be compliant." As that statement demonstrates that the smaller EGC is still sized "to provide an effective ground fault current path."

Cheers, Wayne
 

tortuga

Code Historian
Location
Oregon
Occupation
Electrical Design
Actually, I've never been a fan of opening up a disconnect and not seeing the wiring rated for the OCPD ahead of it , but, that's just me.

JAP>
Yeah especially in residential with long runs of NM cable.
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
Occupation
EC
Technically true, but I would hope an inspector wouldn't pull that. The next AC unit may have an MCA of 31 and now you'd be ripping out that #10 and installing #8. And you'd still have a #10 EGC in the latter case.

I must be in real trouble because the AC tech who installed mine put in #6 NM cable because he only looked at the 50A breaker and not the MCA. Now I have a smaller AC unit on that same wire with an MCA in the high 20's and a 40A breaker.
Part of the problem is it is kind of written as a one size fits all rule.
Could also have a situation with 6 AWG conductor on 60 amp OCPD and use a 10 AWG EGC.
 

Daja7

Senior Member
I'm a proponent of the idea that the exception to 250.122(B) added in the 2020 NEC provides an escape clause for all the situations in which "if the load was larger, the smaller EGC would obviously be compliant." As that statement demonstrates that the smaller EGC is still sized "to provide an effective ground fault current path."

Cheers, Wayne
Thanks. I read the exception that a qualified person can do something about an adequet grounding pat? did not quote that properly but do not have it ifron of me. Could someone explain that for me? Thanks
 

augie47

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Tennessee
Occupation
State Electrical Inspector (Retired)
The exception references 250.4 which discusses an effective ground fault current path.
The effectiveness of that path is a long discussed topic (See Soares Book on Grounding as an example).
IMO, the reference to a "qualified person" in the exception would be someone like a P.E. with expertise in grounding,
 

tortuga

Code Historian
Location
Oregon
Occupation
Electrical Design
That was my point. but they said if used larger than the minimum you have to size the ground larger than the #10 that is proper for for 8.
250.122 clearly permits a equipment grounding conductor to be #10 AWG CU for a 40A feeder with #8 CU.
There is no need to upsize your equipment ground in that case.
 

Eddie702

Licensed Electrician
Location
Western Massachusetts
Occupation
Electrician
#10 ground is good for up to 60 a breaker or fuses. it has been that way for decades.

Many electricians don't understand that the wire does not have to match the breaker or fuse size because it is a motor circuit. The motors in the unit are thermally protected to prevent conductor overload.

The MCA is the "minimum" circuit amps of the wire, you can always use larger wire if you want but are not obligated to do that.

The MOCP is the 'maximum" size breaker or fuses that the "minimum MCA wire size" is allowed to be used with.

You can always use a smaller MOCP but are not obligated to do that either. But the MOCP must be large enough for the equipment to start.
 

wwhitney

Senior Member
Location
Berkeley, CA
Occupation
Retired
250.122 clearly permits a equipment grounding conductor to be #10 AWG CU for a 40A feeder with #8 CU.
The main text does not. The main text says that if that same circuit would be compliant with #10 Cu ungrounded conductors, then you've upsized the ungrounded conductors by using #8, so you must upsize the EGC.

However, as this is unreasonable, the exception gives us an out.

Cheers, Wayne
 

wwhitney

Senior Member
Location
Berkeley, CA
Occupation
Retired
IMO, the reference to a "qualified person" in the exception would be someone like a P.E. with expertise in grounding,
You don't need to be a PE to recognize that the whether a ground fault path is effective is independent of what the load is. So changing the load from one type to another type, when the breaker stays the same or is downsized, and the conductors remain the same, does not change the effectiveness of the ground fault path.

Cheers, Wayne
 

tortuga

Code Historian
Location
Oregon
Occupation
Electrical Design
The main text does not. The main text says that if that same circuit would be compliant with #10 Cu ungrounded conductors, then you've upsized the ungrounded conductors by using #8, so you must upsize the EGC.

However, as this is unreasonable, the exception gives us an out.

Cheers, Wayne
The OP is proposing to use a 40A OCPD with a #10 equipment ground this is done and passes inspections every day.
You can go up to and including a 60A OCPD and use a #10. Only at 65A OCPD (wire) would you need a #8
250.122.png
 
Last edited:

LarryFine

Master Electrician Electric Contractor Richmond VA
Location
Henrico County, VA
Occupation
Electrical Contractor
The inspector is saying that, because the conductors are larger than required, they therefore must have been "increased in size," which means the EGC must likewise be increased proportionately.
 
Last edited:
Top