rruelas123
Member
- Location
- Schaumburg IL
Hoping to find a couple of advisory interpretations regarding a project we are designing.
In a recent survey of a existing building with (2) electrical services (1 at 400A 208/120 3phase, 4 wire from 1959 and a second at 800A 480/277, 3phase 4 wire from 2009) we discovered the following regarding the grounding electrodes currently in use.
The 1959 service only has a visible connection to a 3/4" cold water pipe within the same room approximately 5 inches above the concrete slab. Our plumbing engineer in reviewing the existing drawings does believe this cold water pipe does travel under or perhaps within the existing slab for at least 10' before rising up again and connecting to a existing sink. Per the 1959 NEC 250.81 a "metallic underground water piping system, either local or supplying a community shall always be used as the grounding electrode where such a piping system is available". The 1959 code does not distinguish that the metallic underground water pipe has to be the water service pipe, nor does is state as the current code does that it has to be in direct contact with earth. That said, by the letter of the 1959 code, we believe this grounding electrode to be in compliance with the code it was installed under.
The 2009 service only has a visible connection to a abandoned 3" water pipe in the same room approximately 10" above where this pipe rises above the slab. This 3" water pipe was the the main water service to the building, but around the same time the 2009 electrical service went in, this pipe was capped in the building and cut off from the city main supply in the street approximately 150' away. In effect, this pipe is no longer a water pipe as it is abandoned and does not supply water to the building, it is only a empty pipe in the ground. During this same renovation project, a new water service was brought into the building approximately 200' away in a new building addition at the time.
Our current renovation project involves removing the underground branch pipe that the 1959 service is utilizing as a GE (grounding electrode). I explained to the owner and architect, that if we remove that underground pipe, we now need to provide a new GE and a new GEC, and since there is a new water service we would need to take that GEC to the water service and utilize the main water service as the GE. Of course the prospect of adding several thousand dollars to the project is not going over well. One of there responses was "why can we just not go to the abandoned 3" water main that the 2009 service is connected to".
Based on our interpenetration, the 3" abandoned water service is not a Grounding Electrode as it is not a water pipe anymore as it is not connected to the building water system, nor is it connected to the city water main and under current code, we can not connect the 1959 service to it. Additionally our interpenetration is that the 2009 Electrical service is currently in violation. We believe it to be in violation, as there is a underground water pipe (the main water service) in direct connection with the earth present in the building (although 200' away in another portion of the building) and that the 2009 service should be utilizing that pipe as a GE since it is present.
In summary, we believe that if the current metal water pipe under slab that the 1959 service is connected to is removed, we are required to run a GEC 200' to the main water service and that the use of any other metal water pipe under slab will not satisfy 250.62 of the 2014 (current edition in effect in this jurisdiction) code as there is no guarantee a under slab (or in slab) metallic water pipe is in "direct contact with earth". Additionally we believe the 2009 service should be disconnected from the abandoned 3" pipe and a new GEC also ran to the main water service. Based on the above does anyone have a different interpenetration to offer? Is there something we are not considering that would allow us to not run 200' of GEC to the building water service?
Any feedback is appreciated.
rruelas123
engineer
In a recent survey of a existing building with (2) electrical services (1 at 400A 208/120 3phase, 4 wire from 1959 and a second at 800A 480/277, 3phase 4 wire from 2009) we discovered the following regarding the grounding electrodes currently in use.
The 1959 service only has a visible connection to a 3/4" cold water pipe within the same room approximately 5 inches above the concrete slab. Our plumbing engineer in reviewing the existing drawings does believe this cold water pipe does travel under or perhaps within the existing slab for at least 10' before rising up again and connecting to a existing sink. Per the 1959 NEC 250.81 a "metallic underground water piping system, either local or supplying a community shall always be used as the grounding electrode where such a piping system is available". The 1959 code does not distinguish that the metallic underground water pipe has to be the water service pipe, nor does is state as the current code does that it has to be in direct contact with earth. That said, by the letter of the 1959 code, we believe this grounding electrode to be in compliance with the code it was installed under.
The 2009 service only has a visible connection to a abandoned 3" water pipe in the same room approximately 10" above where this pipe rises above the slab. This 3" water pipe was the the main water service to the building, but around the same time the 2009 electrical service went in, this pipe was capped in the building and cut off from the city main supply in the street approximately 150' away. In effect, this pipe is no longer a water pipe as it is abandoned and does not supply water to the building, it is only a empty pipe in the ground. During this same renovation project, a new water service was brought into the building approximately 200' away in a new building addition at the time.
Our current renovation project involves removing the underground branch pipe that the 1959 service is utilizing as a GE (grounding electrode). I explained to the owner and architect, that if we remove that underground pipe, we now need to provide a new GE and a new GEC, and since there is a new water service we would need to take that GEC to the water service and utilize the main water service as the GE. Of course the prospect of adding several thousand dollars to the project is not going over well. One of there responses was "why can we just not go to the abandoned 3" water main that the 2009 service is connected to".
Based on our interpenetration, the 3" abandoned water service is not a Grounding Electrode as it is not a water pipe anymore as it is not connected to the building water system, nor is it connected to the city water main and under current code, we can not connect the 1959 service to it. Additionally our interpenetration is that the 2009 Electrical service is currently in violation. We believe it to be in violation, as there is a underground water pipe (the main water service) in direct connection with the earth present in the building (although 200' away in another portion of the building) and that the 2009 service should be utilizing that pipe as a GE since it is present.
In summary, we believe that if the current metal water pipe under slab that the 1959 service is connected to is removed, we are required to run a GEC 200' to the main water service and that the use of any other metal water pipe under slab will not satisfy 250.62 of the 2014 (current edition in effect in this jurisdiction) code as there is no guarantee a under slab (or in slab) metallic water pipe is in "direct contact with earth". Additionally we believe the 2009 service should be disconnected from the abandoned 3" pipe and a new GEC also ran to the main water service. Based on the above does anyone have a different interpenetration to offer? Is there something we are not considering that would allow us to not run 200' of GEC to the building water service?
Any feedback is appreciated.
rruelas123
engineer