Originally posted by

**david luchini**View Post**The equation using 440.33 with the resultant figure (46.15) is correct in terms of the given numbers presented in the equation.**

**However, OP (either a typo) or misreading the article (430.24.) had written the multiplier 0.25 instead of 1.25.**

**The math is correct, the way it was presented in terms of how the article should be presented is different. (0.25 vs 1.25) .**

**I would be glad to hear from OP regarding this.**

**This borders on pedantry. . . and you know better than that.**

## Comment