Nuber
State Certified Practitioner of Electrical Arts
- Location
- Colorado
- Occupation
- Master Electrician
Nuber: My interpretation of your discussion implies that you fail to understand circuit theory.
With respect - You have the right to interpret anything you wish to in any manner. I have explained this theory using electrical principles. Not sure that there is any more that I can do.
The voltage at the input to your main panel is not a constant even if the power company primary supply voltage is a constant, which it is not.
You are analyzing the system over seconds of time, if not hours. I am analyzing moments in time closer to the scale of milliseconds. An alternating current system in the US is constantly changing (60 full cycles per second). I am talking about the difference between the moment the AC contactor is open compared to the very next moment when the AC contactor is closed. RMS Voltage is constant in these two moments.
My next door neighbor does not get his power from my main panel, but we are the only ones, except for two street lights, that share the same 50 kVA transformer.
OK
When my neighbor's air conditioner kicks in my lights slightly flicker. The service wire and transformer impedances are the cause.
Not exactly and not fully. Where does the electron come from that first travels to your neighbor’s AC unit? How about the next million electrons? Are you trying to tell me that 100% of those electrons come exclusively from the utility in the exact moment after the contactor closes? The electrons for the AC circuit just skip right on by every other circuit in the panel and only come from the utility wiring without affecting anything else along the way? Kirchoff disagrees with you.
For any load I place on my main panel the voltage drop along the bus bars is nil compared to power company line drop.
True. Not my point at all. I am not analyzing the voltage drop on the bus, nor the voltage drop at any point of the utility. I am analyzing the severe shock that a 100 amp load instantaneously introduced on the panel bus causes to the system overall.
With an incandescent bulb I have to concentrate and have "signal known exactly" to detect a 1 V change in applied voltage to the bulb. 2 V is more likely to catch my attention without the "signal known exactly". With "signal known exactly" I may be able to detect a light flicker that I really don't know that I saw. I have been a subject in such psychophysical experiments, back in 1953.
Cool. I would be interested in hearing or reading more about this if you have any links to provide. I fully concede the point that light flicker is highly susceptible to perception capabilities of the viewer.
From the Internet
Psychophysics is the scientific study of the relationship between stimuli (specified in physical terms) and the sensations and perceptions evoked by these stimuli. The term psychophysics is used to denote both the substantive study of stimulus-response relationships and the methodologies used for this study.
Put a 100 A load at the far end of a main panel bus bar and measure the voltage drop along the bus. I did a test with a 10 A load change and possibly saw a 1 millivolt change along a 200 A bus bar. Or at 200 A this would be about 20 millivolts. Almost certainly not worse than this. You won't see light flicker from a 20 millivolt change.
I would suggest this - We are not having an issue with me not understanding electrical theory. We are having an issue about discussing different things (I am speaking oranges, you are speaking apples). I am talking about current flow over a time period of milliseconds across the entirety of an electrical panel and their associated circuits. You are talking about voltage drop across a bus bar.
I am saying that whatever voltage drop on the bus bar that exists is negligible to this discussion, that current flow on a millisecond time scale is the factor we are addressing here. Where do those electrons come from in the instant that new 100 amp load is introduced to the bus?