Subject: ocpd 'next size up' rule(s), 240.4 etc. as applied to branch circuits.
I aim to shape my understanding of 'next size up' v's branch circuits.
What general statement(s) can be made about 'next size up'-ing OCPD's for branch circuits ?
In light of
240.4(D) (ocpd ratings for small conductors), and in light of
210.3 'Rating' (Branch Circuits, including max ocpd ratings for branch circuit ratings set forth therein), and in light of
Table 210.24 (summary of branch circuit requirements, including OCPD protection), and in
light of
240.4(B)(1), a pre-condition of 'next size up'-ing saying "The conductors being protected are not part of a multioutlet branch circuit supplying receptacles for cord-and-plug-connected portable loads." (similar requirement in 210.19A(2) ),
instances would seem rare and slim that a 'next size up' decision could be made for a branch circuit, except for applications under 240.4(G) Overcurrent Protection for Specific Conductor Applications as compiled in Table 240.4(G).
Would you find any credibility in the above statement?
How could it be changed to be more accurate or in accord with the code ?
I am trying to solidify or gain perspecitve on this subject of 240.4(B) provision, quote,
"The next higher standard overcurrent device rating (above the ampacity of the conductors being protected) shall be permitted to be used, provided all of the following conditions are met...."
Any comments, observations, suggestions, etc, appreciated.
--Toolhound
I aim to shape my understanding of 'next size up' v's branch circuits.
What general statement(s) can be made about 'next size up'-ing OCPD's for branch circuits ?
In light of
240.4(D) (ocpd ratings for small conductors), and in light of
210.3 'Rating' (Branch Circuits, including max ocpd ratings for branch circuit ratings set forth therein), and in light of
Table 210.24 (summary of branch circuit requirements, including OCPD protection), and in
light of
240.4(B)(1), a pre-condition of 'next size up'-ing saying "The conductors being protected are not part of a multioutlet branch circuit supplying receptacles for cord-and-plug-connected portable loads." (similar requirement in 210.19A(2) ),
instances would seem rare and slim that a 'next size up' decision could be made for a branch circuit, except for applications under 240.4(G) Overcurrent Protection for Specific Conductor Applications as compiled in Table 240.4(G).
Would you find any credibility in the above statement?
How could it be changed to be more accurate or in accord with the code ?
I am trying to solidify or gain perspecitve on this subject of 240.4(B) provision, quote,
"The next higher standard overcurrent device rating (above the ampacity of the conductors being protected) shall be permitted to be used, provided all of the following conditions are met...."
Any comments, observations, suggestions, etc, appreciated.
--Toolhound