Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Romex for DC run

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Romex for DC run

    Legal or not? Code reference if applicable.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    #2
    Legal,no prohibition.

    Get the NM cable from Canada; they have it with red and black, no white.

    I call it DC Romex.



    See: 210.5(C)(2), 250.162 and 250.164, 410.134, and solar if applicable.
    Master Electrician
    Electrical Contractor
    Richmond, VA

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by LarryFine View Post
      Legal,no prohibition.

      Get the NM cable from Canada; they have it with red and black, no white.

      I call it DC Romex.



      See: 210.5(C)(2), 250.162 and 250.164, 410.134, and solar if applicable.
      How would you label it as a photovoltaic source?


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Dbarrett View Post
        How would you label it as a photovoltaic source?
        Start at 690.31.
        Master Electrician
        Electrical Contractor
        Richmond, VA

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by LarryFine View Post
          Start at 690.31.
          690.31 Methods Permitted.

          (A) Wiring Systems. All raceway and cable wiring methods included in this Code, other wiring systems and fittings specifically listed for use on PV arrays, and wiring as part of a listed system shall be permitted. Where wiring devices with integral enclosures are used, sufficient length of cable shall be provided to facilitate replacement.

          Where PV source and output circuits operating at voltages greater than 30 volts are installed in readily accessible locations, circuit conductors shall be guarded or installed in Type MC cable or in raceway. For ambient temperatures exceeding 30°C (86°F), conductor ampacities shall be corrected in accordance with Table 690.31(A).

          Sorry, I’m not seeing the argument that nm is allowed. It says it needs to be guarded or in a raceway.


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

          Comment


            #6
            Not legal for a circuit connected directly to solar panels.

            Needs to be either:

            a) beyond the first readily accessible disconnecting means

            or, perhaps...

            b) a DC-to-DC converter output circuit, as opposed to a PV source or output circuit

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Dbarrett View Post
              Sorry, I’m not seeing the argument that nm is allowed. It says it needs to be guarded or in a raceway.
              690.31 Methods Permitted.

              (A) Wiring Systems. [COLOR=#ff0000]All raceway and cable wiring methods included in this Code[/COLOR], other wiring systems and fittings specifically listed for use on PV arrays, and wiring as part of a listed system [COLOR=#ff0000]shall be permitted[/COLOR]. Where wiring devices with integral enclosures are used, sufficient length of cable shall be provided to facilitate replacement.
              Master Electrician
              Electrical Contractor
              Richmond, VA

              Comment


                #8
                Look at 690.31(G).

                There was a long standing requirement for metal raceways for PV source and output circuits, only slightly relaxed in recent code cycles.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Dbarrett View Post
                  Legal or not? Code reference if applicable.


                  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                  Not around here, anyway. DC needs to be in a metal raceway.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    We are still in the last decade code wise, but on the interior of buildings, generated dc in metal conduits. On the exterior it would be fine except it wouldn't because it's nm cable..... Probably UF could be used on the exterior though...... yuck......
                    85deg. an Sunny today.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Assuming you are speaking about source circuit conductors, there would be numerous encumbrances to use of NM "romex:"


                      First, the location is almost certainly going to be damp or wet. Not allowed to use NM in this location. 334.12(B).

                      Second, there will likely be be numerous questions about exposure to physical damage, mitigation of which could make NM cable not worth the cost.

                      Third, you would likely have to transition to another wiring method via a junction box or something, to connect to the modules (can't just strip the romex and leave it in the air.

                      PV Wire (which usually us a USE-2/RHW wire with a 2000V rating and marked as PV wire) is readily available nowadays.

                      Regarding the comments on the need to guard conductors or enclose in a raceway per 690.31, this requirement could apply, regardless of if one is using NM cable, or PV Wire. This would be a conversation to have with the inspector in many cases, as to is the wires are considered readily accessible. here are some examples of interpretations of 690.31:

                      - An unfenced ground mounted solar array in someone's yard would have conductors that are readily accessible, and would need either guarding or raceway.

                      - A PV install on a rooftop would require the use of ladders, and would therefore not be readily accessible.

                      - A commercial PV installation with a fence meeting the requirement of 110.31 would meet the requirement for being "guarded" and the conductors inside would not have to be enclosed in a raceway simply due to their being readily accessible.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        So I read all the posts and if I read them correctly, the only approved flexible cable assembly for DC PV run is type MC?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Read 690.31(G). That's basically correct but there's still a bit more to it.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by five.five-six View Post
                            So I read all the posts and if I read them correctly, the only approved flexible cable assembly for DC PV run is type MC?

                            Inside a building, if it is not otherwise inside a raceway, yes. DC circuits from solar arrays, have to be in metal, in some form or another. This would either mean using metal clad or armored cable, or using a metal raceway.

                            Outside within the array field on the racking, you do have other options for using a multiconductor cable, if it is either "guarded" by being not readily accessible or by being behind a locked fence. The cable you would use would have to be listed for use in a wet location, UV stable, and if your system is over 600V, it would also have to carry a special voltage rating. NM cable (e.g. Romex) meets none of these requirements.
                            Last edited by Carultch; 04-19-19, 07:20 PM.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Carultch View Post
                              Inside a building, if it is not otherwise inside a raceway, yes. DC circuits from solar arrays, have to be in metal, in some form or another. This would either mean using metal clad or armored cable, or using a metal raceway.

                              Outside within the array field on the racking, you do have other options for using a multiconductor cable, if it is either "guarded" by being not readily accessible or by being behind a locked fence. The cable you would use would have to be listed for use in a wet location, UV stable, and if your system is over 600V, it would also have to carry a special voltage rating. NM cable (e.g. Romex) meets none of these requirements.

                              Good info, this first job I’m doing is on my own home and getting a raceway from the array would be an absolute nightmare with windows doors and eaves in the way there is no elegant way to make a run however with a new roof penetration, I can easily intersect the path that my #4 is taking from the new panel to the water service.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X