Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can i do this

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BandGap1.1eV
    replied
    Originally posted by hhsting View Post
    You are saying something like the attached sketch?

    Sent from my SM-G935U using Tapatalk


    Confirmed. Like this.

    Leave a comment:


  • jaggedben
    replied
    Originally posted by hhsting View Post
    Ok but 705.11(D) Grounding and Bonding from second draft apply to disconnecting means mentioned in 705.11(E). However 705.11(E) is about connections not about disconnecting means. No disconnecting means 705.11(E). Am I missing something?
    You're missing that (D) refers to (F), not (E).

    Leave a comment:


  • hhsting
    replied
    Originally posted by jaggedben View Post
    705.11
    Ok but 705.11(D) Grounding and Bonding from second draft apply to disconnecting means mentioned in 705.11(E). However 705.11(E) is about connections not about disconnecting means. No disconnecting means 705.11(E). Am I missing something?

    Leave a comment:


  • jaggedben
    replied
    Originally posted by hhsting View Post
    Ok. What article in second draft 230 or 690?
    705.11

    Leave a comment:


  • hhsting
    replied
    Originally posted by jaggedben View Post
    http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraView...&pubStatus=SDR

    You need to register with the NFPA website, which costs no money.
    Ok. What article in second draft 230 or 690?

    Sent from my SM-G935U using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • jaggedben
    replied
    Originally posted by hhsting View Post
    Is it made public? You have link?

    http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraView...&pubStatus=SDR

    You need to register with the NFPA website, which costs no money.

    Leave a comment:


  • hhsting
    replied
    Originally posted by jaggedben View Post
    The second draft should be further down the page.

    2nd draft will not change in substance, only to fix errors.
    Is it made public? You have link?

    Sent from my SM-G935U using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • jaggedben
    replied
    The second draft should be further down the page.

    2nd draft will not change in substance, only to fix errors.

    Leave a comment:


  • hhsting
    replied
    I still was not able to find 2020 second draft found first draft though.

    What is the proabability that second draft would be modified into something different i.e third draft? Can they still do that?

    Sent from my SM-G935U using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • jaggedben
    replied
    Originally posted by romex jockey View Post
    I'll guess this is the 705/230 quagmire we've been hearing about

    ~RJ~
    They just can't seem to get it right. I thought the first draft was basically fine. And then just when they finally decided to clarify things in 705, the other CMP went ahead and changed 230.71 and created new confusion.

    Leave a comment:


  • romex jockey
    replied
    Originally posted by jaggedben View Post
    2020 I believe is going to prohibit a N-G bond in the solar disco and require a supply side bonding jumper back to the main disco. It changed between the first and second draft.

    But I would say that under 2014 and any other code besides 2020, you can treat them like you would multiple service disconnects, if the AHJ doesn't have an opinion.
    Originally posted by BandGap1.1eV View Post
    Best practices dictate a N-G bond only at one location, the main service disconnect. While we design and treat the solar disconnect as a service disconnect, it's not considered a "service".

    Bond the solar EGC to the main service EGC at the service entrance but leave neutral unbonded in the PV disconnect.
    I'll guess this is the 705/230 quagmire we've been hearing about

    ~RJ~

    Leave a comment:


  • roger
    replied
    Originally posted by hhsting View Post
    Whwre can I find the latest 2020 draft?

    Sent from my SM-G935U using Tapatalk
    The NFPA website.

    Roger

    Leave a comment:


  • hhsting
    replied
    Originally posted by jaggedben View Post
    2020 I believe is going to prohibit a N-G bond in the solar disco and require a supply side bonding jumper back to the main disco. It changed between the first and second draft.

    But I would say that under 2014 and any other code besides 2020, you can treat them like you would multiple service disconnects, if the AHJ doesn't have an opinion.
    Whwre can I find the latest 2020 draft?

    Sent from my SM-G935U using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • hhsting
    replied
    Originally posted by BandGap1.1eV View Post
    Best practices dictate a N-G bond only at one location, the main service disconnect. While we design and treat the solar disconnect as a service disconnect, it's not considered a "service".

    Bond the solar EGC to the main service EGC at the service entrance but leave neutral unbonded in the PV disconnect.
    You are saying something like the attached sketch?

    Sent from my SM-G935U using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • BandGap1.1eV
    replied
    Best practices dictate a N-G bond only at one location, the main service disconnect. While we design and treat the solar disconnect as a service disconnect, it's not considered a "service".

    Bond the solar EGC to the main service EGC at the service entrance but leave neutral unbonded in the PV disconnect.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X