codebook...

[sparky723]

Ok, I have decided to go with a tabbed and hilighted codebook as my new 08 codebook. which would YOU choose, Tom henry's version or Dan Dudley's version? Dan's can be seen at Dan Dudley.com. I would like feedback from anyone who has one or the other. Thanks.

 

[480sparky]

I use a couple plain-jane looseleafs and the CD.

 

[raider1]

I just use the NFPA's version, I have both the softbound and the CD version.

Chris

 

[bphgravity]

I think it is best to highlight and tab your own book. It's a great way to get really familair with it.

 

[Rockyd]

Knowing Raider1, and his ability to navigate through a codebook, I would follow his lead in referring how to become adept in the code. Ditto BPH's remarks. You can't become a codemeister overnight, but in a couple of years, you can be a knight, and student of the code

Welcome to coming after the next level.

 

[celtic]

I don't own either and I can't imagine of what use they would be.

Highlighting the book yourself seems an appropriate way to get ahead of the curve.

 

[HMEL565]

I like to highlight a loose leaf and then I use the commercially available colored tabs to help identify the diffrents sections of the code book. Highlight your own to get in the zone.

 

[resistance]

I don't own either and I can't imagine of what use they would be.

Highlighting the book yourself seems an appropriate way to get ahead of the curve.

I agree! Yet, a highlighted (pre-highlighted by the owner of the book, or by the supplier) book during examination comes in handy sometimes. But, that's just me.

 

[wawireguy]

I like a non-tabbed NFPA handbook myself..

 

[guschash]

I have both the soft and the handbook by NFPA. I do not own highlighting and have tabs for the soft. I keep trying but there is sooooooo much information my head spins.