I have always specified #4/0 bare copper ground between rod and other bonding surface (panel, steel, etc.).
Rods are either 5/8" or 3/4".
Is #4/0 overkill? This is for an industrial application.
Even using Table 250.66 you never need to go larger than 3/0 copper for a grounding electrode conductor.
Chris
Yes, but it is easier to carry one size on the truck. And #4 will get more use to grding. electrodes. And you will acummalate small pieces to go to the grd. rods.
If you are not doing services in mass, that is.
I have always specified #4/0 bare copper ground between rod and other bonding surface (panel, steel, etc.).
Rods are either 5/8" or 3/4".
Is #4/0 overkill? This is for an industrial application.
I think your question has been answer but I want to state if these jobs are new construction then you should be using a concrete encase electrode (in the footing) instead of ground rods.I have always specified #4/0 bare copper ground between rod and other bonding surface (panel, steel, etc.).
Rods are either 5/8" or 3/4".
Is #4/0 overkill? This is for an industrial application.
I think your question has been answer but I want to state if these jobs are new construction then you should be using a concrete encase electrode (in the footing) instead of ground rods.
The concrete encased electrodes would only be present if there is reinforcing steel present in the footings or foundation. Our jurisdiction has approved quite a few structures with un-reinforced footings, foundation walls, and wire mesh (<0.5 in dia.) in concrete floor slabs. FYI.
Not quite true. You can also install 20 feet of #4 copper in the footing and it is still a CEE even without the rebar.The concrete encased electrodes would only be present if there is reinforcing steel present in the footings or foundation. Our jurisdiction has approved quite a few structures with un-reinforced footings, foundation walls, and wire mesh (<0.5 in dia.) in concrete floor slabs. FYI.
Not quite true. You can also install 20 feet of #4 copper in the footing and it is still a CEE even without the rebar.
Dennis I think that he's trying to say that without the rebar the CEE is not considered present and therefore not required.
That may be , I don't know but in either case my original point was not that it is required but that it would be better to use than the ground rods.![]()