Abtech Electric
Member
I have been in discussions with an "Engineer" over the following. He insist that
a 30amp breaker 208volt three phase will be adequate for a 7.5HP motor on an air compressor. Problem one is that he thinks all that needs done is take 125% of the nameplate rating for the circuit, breaker and disconnect size. Problem two is that when he reads the manufacturers recommendation is does not know the difference between a time delay fuse and a breaker.
Recommendation only list fuse size. Problem three is that he insist because of the starting means for reduced voltage starter that it may remain on a 30amp circuit.
I tried to get him to listen to my argument that 430.6 prepares the minimum ampacity as per table 430.150. I tried to explain that the NEC is the minimum requirements allowed despite name plate or manufacturers ratings. No where did I read that the starting means allows this to be lower than the table allows. I have tried to show him these code minimum requirements and my calculations from 430.6, 430.52 and table 430.150 and he holds his decision to a manufacturers recommendation that he his reading wrong.
Has any one ran across this before. Inspectors won't give there time to put together a proper legal response. My only other thing I could do is to hire a real Engineer to do the calculations and help back me up.
Thanks
a 30amp breaker 208volt three phase will be adequate for a 7.5HP motor on an air compressor. Problem one is that he thinks all that needs done is take 125% of the nameplate rating for the circuit, breaker and disconnect size. Problem two is that when he reads the manufacturers recommendation is does not know the difference between a time delay fuse and a breaker.
Recommendation only list fuse size. Problem three is that he insist because of the starting means for reduced voltage starter that it may remain on a 30amp circuit.
I tried to get him to listen to my argument that 430.6 prepares the minimum ampacity as per table 430.150. I tried to explain that the NEC is the minimum requirements allowed despite name plate or manufacturers ratings. No where did I read that the starting means allows this to be lower than the table allows. I have tried to show him these code minimum requirements and my calculations from 430.6, 430.52 and table 430.150 and he holds his decision to a manufacturers recommendation that he his reading wrong.
Has any one ran across this before. Inspectors won't give there time to put together a proper legal response. My only other thing I could do is to hire a real Engineer to do the calculations and help back me up.
Thanks