clausb
Member
- Location
- Rutland, Vermont
I have searched the Forum site and found some reference to this issue back in July. Well here we are again, same issue, same inspector. Here is the details:
We have a project in construction at an industrial site in California where we are adding a production line. We had to install a new service entrance and all new distribution specifically to support this plastic bottle blowmolding process and utilities. We have the service installed and most of the feeders and circuits at this time. Most loads are 3 phase, 3 wire with ground.
My inspector is telling us that we need to pull a grounded conductor (neutral conductor) with EVERY three phase feeder and circuit, whether it is required or not. Wow. He cites 200.2. OK, I see that. But the exemptions cited by 200.2 such as 210.10 and 215.7 identify that ungrounded taps from a grounded system are acceptable. This same inspector's responses in the past according to this forum were that the feeders and circuits are not taps. And what do we do with the ungrounded conductors where they terminate in the 3 pole, 3 wire equipment? Just cap them.
I understand that this inspector disagrees with the way 200.2 is worded and is enforcing his interpretation in an effort to get others behind his cause. Well I do not agree that this fight should be carried on the backs of the customer trying to get a project built.
There was no follow-up on the previous thread regarding how that project was resolved. We are looking at a costly effort to re-pull ALL the wiring to add a grounded/neutral conductor and a costly hit to our project schedule.
I have looked at the exceptions and definitions (and lack of definition in the case of "TAP") and have not found a good way to argue this except for 210.10, 215.7 and appeal to him with 90.4 in that this is a safe installation without the capped off grounded conductor. If anything, the extra conductor abandoned in the conduit could constitute a hazard.
Appreciate any help and/or insight you all can provide.
We have a project in construction at an industrial site in California where we are adding a production line. We had to install a new service entrance and all new distribution specifically to support this plastic bottle blowmolding process and utilities. We have the service installed and most of the feeders and circuits at this time. Most loads are 3 phase, 3 wire with ground.
My inspector is telling us that we need to pull a grounded conductor (neutral conductor) with EVERY three phase feeder and circuit, whether it is required or not. Wow. He cites 200.2. OK, I see that. But the exemptions cited by 200.2 such as 210.10 and 215.7 identify that ungrounded taps from a grounded system are acceptable. This same inspector's responses in the past according to this forum were that the feeders and circuits are not taps. And what do we do with the ungrounded conductors where they terminate in the 3 pole, 3 wire equipment? Just cap them.
I understand that this inspector disagrees with the way 200.2 is worded and is enforcing his interpretation in an effort to get others behind his cause. Well I do not agree that this fight should be carried on the backs of the customer trying to get a project built.
There was no follow-up on the previous thread regarding how that project was resolved. We are looking at a costly effort to re-pull ALL the wiring to add a grounded/neutral conductor and a costly hit to our project schedule.
I have looked at the exceptions and definitions (and lack of definition in the case of "TAP") and have not found a good way to argue this except for 210.10, 215.7 and appeal to him with 90.4 in that this is a safe installation without the capped off grounded conductor. If anything, the extra conductor abandoned in the conduit could constitute a hazard.
Appreciate any help and/or insight you all can provide.