Fire Alarm T Taps

Status
Not open for further replies.

cadpoint

Senior Member
Location
Durham, NC
MH's Article 760

MH's Article 760

Here's a free MH overview of: Article 760 ((this is a direct download))

It is explained in his own words this is a high point summary of the Article as published in his newsletter, 1.19.10.

This is only in reference to NFPA 70, I only breezed through it...

In the ten pages of the PDF, the Word, T-Tap is not mentioned, Tap in search commons up as staples, in Adobe search... I've given up on search processes for a while! :cool:

But it is a very good read, to know of the various aspects and a good broad overview (highlights and MH pic's) of getting the work done, one can't go wrong! JMO.

This is for all those the play along, like I do, reading about the IMO mysterious F/A system. LOL

Enjoy...
 

gadfly56

Senior Member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Professional Engineer, Fire & Life Safety
What is the best method out thewre for t tapping fire alarm SLC conductors? I am looking for the easiest and safest suggestions.

You can try these: http://www.1sae.com/products/intaccess/FB4.html ; they're pretty neat and you can check the branches for shorts and grounds without the tedium of pulling the wire nuts off, putting them back on, pulling them off, on, off, ad nauseum. Since each wire is individually captured, you can change wire sizes at the block without worrying if the #18 is going to sneak out from under the screw with the #12.
 

Rob454

Member
T tapping is not allowed on my jobs. EVER. i dont like it never did never will.
Yes it can be done. Some panels do not a like more than a certain # of t taps. Edwards panels are like that.
 

Security101

Senior Member
Location
Northern Indiana
You can try these: http://www.1sae.com/products/intaccess/FB4.html ; they're pretty neat and you can check the branches for shorts and grounds without the tedium of pulling the wire nuts off, putting them back on, pulling them off, on, off, ad nauseum. Since each wire is individually captured, you can change wire sizes at the block without worrying if the #18 is going to sneak out from under the screw with the #12.

Those are sharp - I definitely want to check them out!

Jim
 

Security101

Senior Member
Location
Northern Indiana
T tapping is not allowed on my jobs. EVER. i dont like it never did never will.
Yes it can be done. Some panels do not a like more than a certain # of t taps. Edwards panels are like that.

Just curious then, what do you do with a "T-Tapable" system, run all the way through and back and forth through each detector - or homerun them all and t-tap in the control?

Jim
 

gadfly56

Senior Member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Professional Engineer, Fire & Life Safety
Just curious then, what do you do with a "T-Tapable" system, run all the way through and back and forth through each detector - or homerun them all and t-tap in the control?

Jim

Actually, I don't care for T-tapping myself. I've had to unravel someone else's spaghetti in the field after someone walked off with the marked up drawing. It was NOT fun.

The techs who wired my last job seemed to feel that way too. Almost everything was in-and-out, panel to last device. I had pre-assigned the device addresses, and since I was fairly consistant on the device order from floor to floor and addressed them as if they were on a conventional loop (old habits!), that's the way they wired it. It was a gut-and-rehab, with drop ceilings, so there was no real need to T-tap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top