Looks good to me.
Thats the way I see it as well. The 60 amp OCPD provides the protection. The only problem I could see is if the 150 amp OCPD in the panel was not listed for #6 wire.
I agree it's allowed . An other way to do it . Take the main 150 out of the panel. Fill the space with a listed method.
Then install a 60 with a breaker clamp on the bus bar. Bring your service wires to it. Mark it MAIN.
Then you have a 150 breaker available for an emergency call some day.![]()
Pierre if you leave the 150 main breaker in the panel it is probably marked main. I don't see where marking the breaker that turns off the entire panel a main is an issue-- please explain.They are not 'service wires', they are feeder conductors. I do not believe you would call it a "MAIN" either.
I agree it's allowed . An other way to do it . Take the main 150 out of the panel. Fill the space with a listed method.
Then install a 60 with a breaker clamp on the bus bar. Bring your service wires to it. Mark it MAIN.
Then you have a 150 breaker available for an emergency call some day.![]()
Pierre if you leave the 150 main breaker in the panel it is probably marked main. I don't see where marking the breaker that turns off the entire panel a main is an issue-- please explain.
I don't see any problem calling it a "main." What else would you call it?
If he was labeling it "service disconnect" then that would be a different story.