K8MHZ
Senior Member
- Occupation
- Electrician
G
The FCC doesn't agree and won't even let jails jam cell phone signals.
CFR 47 prohibits the intentional interference of any radio signal or communications. No exceptions.
There is some question as to if passive blocking is considered interfering. I say it is. To me it's obvious that the intent of the RF shield in question is to interfere with the signals of a cell phone. So far, the FCC has not cited anyone for using passive blocking methods, but has stepped in when jammers were used, even by the government itself. Schools have tried to be able to use jammers legally to no avail.
W. R. Hollingsworth retired as the head of the enforcement division of the FCC and Laura Smith has taken his place. She is being very aggressive about enforcement.
You all do what you wish, I prefer to let someone else be a test case.
So, no matter what others (most likely with NO background in radio and communications) say, you are better off to let someone else be the designer, hire the attorneys and fight the FCC if it comes down to that. Following designs you did not make should...and I say should bearing in mind today's litigious society, keep you out of the litigation food chain. And that's just on the front of the FCC....there still exists a civil case if, down the road, the customer feels the design you sold them isn't working as marketed.
This is NOT something you want to get involved with if you have no training or experience in the matter. Trust me.
ood point. You should be able to jam signals in your own space.
The FCC doesn't agree and won't even let jails jam cell phone signals.
CFR 47 prohibits the intentional interference of any radio signal or communications. No exceptions.
There is some question as to if passive blocking is considered interfering. I say it is. To me it's obvious that the intent of the RF shield in question is to interfere with the signals of a cell phone. So far, the FCC has not cited anyone for using passive blocking methods, but has stepped in when jammers were used, even by the government itself. Schools have tried to be able to use jammers legally to no avail.
W. R. Hollingsworth retired as the head of the enforcement division of the FCC and Laura Smith has taken his place. She is being very aggressive about enforcement.
You all do what you wish, I prefer to let someone else be a test case.
So, no matter what others (most likely with NO background in radio and communications) say, you are better off to let someone else be the designer, hire the attorneys and fight the FCC if it comes down to that. Following designs you did not make should...and I say should bearing in mind today's litigious society, keep you out of the litigation food chain. And that's just on the front of the FCC....there still exists a civil case if, down the road, the customer feels the design you sold them isn't working as marketed.
This is NOT something you want to get involved with if you have no training or experience in the matter. Trust me.
Last edited: