Corner grounded delta

Status
Not open for further replies.
H

hurt33

Member
I've read through several posts about this but couldn't find a good reason as to why this is even used. In 2001, the company installed a Delta Delta 13.8/480. Later grounded the B phase. No problems encountered. One of the buss ducts it fed had all the equipment grounded with ground rods. That same ground from the B phase is ran to the buss duct as well. If I wanted to remove the corner ground, what type of problems should I expect if any. And the main question is, WHY have a corner grounded Delta to begin with?
 
Hopefully the equipment is grounded by an equipment grounding conductor as well.
Back in the dinosaur days I was taught that the corner ground became "popular" when a nationwide industrial complex used it to reduce cost
on gear by not having to protect the grounded phase.
 
hurt33 said:
I've read through several posts about this but couldn't find a good reason as to why this is even used. In 2001, the company installed a Delta Delta 13.8/480. Later grounded the B phase. No problems encountered. One of the buss ducts it fed had all the equipment grounded with ground rods. That same ground from the B phase is ran to the buss duct as well. If I wanted to remove the corner ground, what type of problems should I expect if any. And the main question is, WHY have a corner grounded Delta to begin with?
Click to expand...

I noticed the way you mentioned that the buss duct was grounded by ground rods, first I want to explain that grounding electrodes do not provide a low impedance path for fault current, nor are they allowed to, without having a low impedance path a fault to a grounded piece of equipment would not cause a breaker or fuse to operate to protect a person from a shock hazard, having a phase or a center tap such as in a WYE bonded to all equipment grounds provides a low impedance path back to source, Electricity does not want to flow to Earth, it wants to return back to source, this maybe a transformer or generator, or other means of supply but not Earth.

Now there are ungrounded systems allowed in certain circumstances but not without a phase monitoring system in place, these are allowed only where having the system go down would provide more of a danger then having a phase go to ground, this is to provide redundancy so the first fault goes to ground and sounds an alarm to allow time to schedule a shut down to repair it without taking the whole system down, it also only creates a grounded system on the first fault, the second fault will still take out the OCPD.
 
A sputtering ground fault is your worse case. One particular industrial complex with an ungrounded system had over 600 motors destroyed by a sputtering ground fault before anybody knew what was going on. :eek:
 
Sematics

Sematics

SG-1 said:
A sputtering ground fault is your worse case. One particular industrial complex with an ungrounded system had over 600 motors destroyed by a sputtering ground fault before anybody knew what was going on. :eek:
Click to expand...

SG-1,
Let's clarify this for threst of us.
By "sputtering" I take it to mean "stricking ground fault" as the intermittent contact to ground of an ungrounded conductor?

TT
 
The buss duct is grounded by a ground rod. The same rod used to ground the B phase. The equipment fed from the buss duct all had grounding rods as well. I appreciate the responses.
 
hurt33 said:
The buss duct is grounded by a ground rod. The same rod used to ground the B phase. The equipment fed from the buss duct all had grounding rods as well. I appreciate the responses.
Click to expand...

OK, so a faulted bus duct will have a metallic path for return current, but if the grounding electrode conductor does not follow the same path as the phase conductor, you may still have a high fault impedance. If there is no EGC to the equipment fed from the bus duct, then this is a problem also.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top