This issue comes up regularly, and it's time to post the actual source.
Most places - the "Left Coast" being the exception (surprise!) are currently on the 2006 IBC. The matter is discussed in section 712.3.2, or "penetrations" in the "fire resistance rated construction" section.
In part, this section makes an EXCEPTION - that is, no special measures, not even putty pads, are required for electrical boxes provided ALL of the following details are met:
1) The box is no larger than 16 sq. inches. Box depth and mud ring type do not matter. the common 4-S complies. The 4-11 does not;
2) The total area of the actual openings does not exceed 100 sq. inches for a 100 sq, ft. wall area. Turn a corner and you're into a different wall area. Each single-gang opening uses somewhat less than 15 sq. in.;and,
3) the box / mud ring face is not set back more than 1/8." This is already part of the NEC.
The above addresses openings on one face of the wall. What about 'back-to-back?'
The same section of the IBC continues:
If the wall has boxes through both sides of the wall, the boxes must be separated by one of the following:
1) At least 24" of horizontal spacing. This has the effect of saying 'different stud bays;
2) A separation at least as wide as the wall is thick, if that space is packed with mineral wool;
3) Solid fireblocking. Thus, a solid wood stud separating stud bays would suffice;
4) Putty pads on both boxes; or
5) Other listed means.
I have simplified the requirements and added my own comments. I strongly reccomend that you visit Bulk Resource, or some other site, and view your State's adopted version of the IBC. Most jurisdictions will have ammendments to the 'model' codes they adopt.