300.13(B) to 200.2(B)

[chris kennedy]

Anyone else think it would be a good idea to delete the text in 300.13(B) and add that text to 200.2(B)? This would keep the requirements for the continuity of the grounged conductor in one place.

Thanks

 

[chris kennedy]

Bump

Bump

57 views and no opinions?

 

[iceworm]

61 views and no opinions

 

[ActionDave]

I say leave it as is. They are each dealing with different situations. Devices are one thing, panels are another. I can't say anything more right now. I used up all my typing energy in my post to Fulthrotl.

 

[don_resqcapt19]

I see no need to move it, but you have until 5pm on the first Friday of November, 2014 to submit a proposal for the 2017 code and then you can find out what the CMP thinks.

 

[infinity]

I see no need to move it, but you have until 5pm on the first Friday of November, 2014 to submit a proposal for the 2017 code and then you can find out what the CMP thinks.

Don, do you have any info on the status of the 2014 proposals?

 

[don_resqcapt19]

Don, do you have any info on the status of the 2014 propsals?

The official ROP will be out in mid July. It looks like you can view the final panel action and comments here. Go to the ROP final ballot. It will give the results of the mail in ballots from the CMP members and their comments. This will be combined with the ROP ballot and become the ROP.