ggunn
PE (Electrical), NABCEP certified
- Location
- Austin, TX, USA
- Occupation
- Consulting Electrical Engineer - Photovoltaic Systems
Again, no. The maximum voltage drop for a circuit is determined by whatever is the lowest voltage acceptable under load for whatever is hanging out there on the other end of the conductors. The ampacity is determined by the heat tolerance of the insulation of the conductors. These are two separate issues, involving separate calculations. Sizing conductors for voltage drop only involves ampacity in that it establishes a minimum conductor size. Determining a minimum conductor size does not involve voltage drop at all, and it is possible to have 100% voltage drop without damage to the conductors if the conductors are long enough.I did not mean that way. The maximum allowable voltage drop for any given circuit is fixed, because the ampacity of the circuit is fixed. So to your question "what is the maximum voltage drop that #1 THHN can safely attain at a 75deg rating?", the answer begins with ''Where is the circuit?''
We all know what to do, at least I think we do. First we establish a conductor size based on ampacity and demand, then we size them up for voltage drop, if needed. The equations for conductor sizing do not have a voltage drop term in them, and the equations for voltage drop do not have an ampacity term in them. It seems very straightforward to me.
This is a silly argument and it's beginning to smell like a troll.