Wiring for disaster-resilience

Learn the NEC with Mike Holt now!

Wiring for disaster-resilience

  • I have more ideas for disaster resilient buildings

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
Status
Not open for further replies.

LadyLuck

Member
Location
South Carolina
I've been doing disaster relief work for years, mostly clearing and gutting houses after hurricanes. At a Disaster Resilient Housing conference we discussed adaptations to current building practices which would be within existing code and could lessen the costs and time of recovery. Attendees were mostly engineers, contractors, researchers, and disaster relief professionals. One example of suggestions which came out of our discussions was to use a membrane (such as Grace Ice and Water shield) instead of roofing felt (and qualify for an insurance discount with some companies), another was using a new nail developed by Clemson University researchers to attach roof sheathing (it combines three different 'holding' strategies).

Now to my question: after Katrina, building officials required houses along the entire coast of Mississippi (where I worked) which were flooded to have all of the NM cable removed and replaced (the paper 'wicks' in the tubing draw in and hold water). It's likely total replacement will be required in the Hurricane Sandy flooded houses, too. Our group at the conference discussed the simple solution of using 'floodable' wiring throughout a house (UF or THWN in conduit) in new construction or renovations in flood prone areas. That could be done pre-disaster to avoid that huge cost of recovery or post-disaster to prevent a repeat. Our calculation was that it would add a few hundred dollars in wire and/or wire and conduit costs and it would be a bit more difficult for the electrical contractor to install (= some amount more in labor cost) but would more than recoup any costs after a flood because of repair costs (totally rewiring a house) and time (weeks or even months since contractors have long lists of clients in such situations). Also, some insurance companies are offering rate decreases for disaster mitigation construction methods and materials (the 'secondary' roof mentioned above) and that might offset some of the cost. Are there any other considerations - pro or con - we left out?
 

Dennis Alwon

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Occupation
Retired Electrical Contractor
Certainly if the area is a high flood area then UF is not a bad idea. Of course panels , lights, devices will have to be replaced.
 

LadyLuck

Member
Location
South Carolina
Yes, receptacles, etc.

Yes, receptacles, etc.

Thanks for specifying that (it was thought but not spoken). And I should have said that, by flood, I mean deep enough to reach receptacles and junction boxes, i.e. get inside the cable.

As an aside, I learned - the hard way after my own house was flooded by Hugo - that electric motors can be restored after a salt water flood (local electric motor shop hosed them out, baked them in a low oven for several days and lubricated them; worked like a charm).
 

petersonra

Senior Member
Location
Northern illinois
Occupation
engineer
I thought UF cable too. I think it's a smart move on anyone's house that has a likelihood of being flood.

An even smarter move is not to build in flood prone areas.

The real answer might be to get an NM like cable that uses THWN insulation and does not have the paper inside it. never understood the need for the paper anyway. UF is more expensive to use indoors then THWN in emt, so is not really a good option.

In any case, you are probably going to have to all but gut a home that gets seriously flooded anyway. I am not sure you gain much by saving a little bit of wiring.
 
Last edited:

Dennis Alwon

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Occupation
Retired Electrical Contractor
I would bet the wire inside the nm jacket will last for many many years even after being in a flood. I have no scientific basis except that I have seen nm underground last for over 20 years. I bet it is still there- haven't seen it in 10 years.
 

renosteinke

Senior Member
Location
NE Arkansas
Ahh, here we go again, that 'wicking paper' shibboleth. (That means 'lie' for those who don't know). By extension, there's also the old 'is Romex safe?' debate.

I have a few 'flood build' ideas, but first I'd like to address that Romex concern.

Whether the paper wicks or not is irrellevant. The paper only surrounds the ground wire .... meaning that the wire can only take electricity 'out' of the water. You might even want to deliberately 'bond' to flood water, as we do in pools. This idea that Romex is so averse to water that we can't even hang it in a 'damp' place like a crawl space or exposed on the ceiling of a porch is absurd. If Romex is that bad, we ought not use it at all.

Otherwise, all you can do is raise things up. I've seen (seasonal) housing built with all the receptacles 5-ft off the floor, simply because the area flooded regularly.

Direct water contact with electrical stuff isn't much of a problem. Perhaps of greater concern are the effects of long-term exposure to extreme humidity and 'salt' exposure.

For example, soaked cellulose ("loosefill") insulation will hold water forever, and the stuff contains various minerals. Any electrical devices nearby will be exposed to a very corrosive atmosphere for a very long time. Bad enough for the connections; terminal for electronics - and the GFCI relies upon electronics.

I've written extensively on the topic of 'flood resistant construction.' There are almost no changes on the electrical side of things. There's a lot you can do regarding wall construction. It's not the 'rescue me from the rooftop' floods you worry about; even an inch of water on the floor will cause $15K in repairs. It's those 'little' floods you can address.

That brings up electrical design. If every receptacle is on the same circuit, and the receptacles are set in the areas that need to be re-worked, the clean-up is greatly complicated. One circuit will not power 12 fans and 3 de-humidifiers. I've tried it........ I know.
 

LadyLuck

Member
Location
South Carolina
gutting vs floodable materials

gutting vs floodable materials

"An even smarter move is not to build in flood prone areas."

Good point, Bob, but many of us already are and can't afford to just abandon our properties. During Hugo, the storm surge came more than two miles inland. All the flood maps were redrawn afterward; the same will probably happen with areas hit by Sandy. Besides, there are natural disasters (fire, tornadoes, earthquakes) in many many places and expecting communities to move to avoid them would cram us together like sardines.

"The real answer might be to get an NM like cable that uses THWN insulation and does not have the paper inside it. "

I didn't know such a thing existed but wonder if that would avoid a related problem, i.e. water being forced into the sheath and remaining there. A 40' run of NM was slit at the midpoint after a surge and water dripped out.


"never understood the need for the paper anyway."

Neither do I; it seems useless (worse, really).


"In any case, you are probably going to have to all but gut a home that gets seriously flooded anyway. I am not sure you gain much by saving a little bit of wiring"

The point of the conference I mentioned was to think of ways to build that will avoid having to gut afterward. That has real economic benefits, not only for homeowners but for businesses and communities. For example, an engineering firm in Gulfport, MS had anticipated a storm worse than Camille (which caused code changes at the time, many of which did not help avoid Katrina damage). They designed their office to BE flooded! Sounds crazy but they hosed it out, checked the electrical and gas and were back in operation within days and, since their focus was structural, geotechnical, and mechanical, they had a full slate of work for the next year. It was very good for their bottom line not to have to gut and rebuild.
 

LadyLuck

Member
Location
South Carolina
I would bet the wire inside the nm jacket will last for many many years even after being in a flood. I have no scientific basis except that I have seen nm underground last for over 20 years. I bet it is still there- haven't seen it in 10 years.

Dennis, I think you're correct, especially 12 or 10 gauge. And, aside from the wet paper and water that remain in the sheath, I would think it would perform well. However, telephone companies use some larger gauge wire (looks like a 4) in their drops to the houses here and every single foot of wire - both small AND large gauge - had to be replaced after the surge from Hugo because it rotted in the ground. It may be because it's salt or perhaps because the surge also stirs up chemicals, oils, etc from whatever it passes over or through.
 

LadyLuck

Member
Location
South Carolina
... first I'd like to address that Romex concern. Whether the paper wicks or not is irrellevant. ...You might even want to deliberately 'bond' to flood water, as we do in pools.

Now THAT is interesting. I'll ponder on that. Thanks!

"Otherwise, all you can do is raise things up. I've seen (seasonal) housing built with all the receptacles 5-ft off the floor, simply because the area flooded regularly. "

Or the whole house goes up. Problem with that is the guesswork that goes into estimating flood heights. On the Mississippi coast, people elevated their houses after Camille, meeting the new code, only to have them blasted to bits by the 30' storm surge that hadn't been anticipated.

Raising the receptacles is a good idea. A really good idea.


"Direct water contact with electrical stuff isn't much of a problem. Perhaps of greater concern are the effects of long-term exposure to extreme humidity and 'salt' exposure. "

I live in a coastal area that is very humid and by all reports that hasn't caused a problem except where people don't seal around wire inlets and condensation occurs (outside air meeting an airconditioned metal box). Salt in salt water is another matter. Let it sit and it continues to eat away at stuff.


"For example, soaked cellulose ("loosefill") insulation will hold water forever, ... Bad enough ..."

Agreed. I chose mineral wool for my insulation. Self drains, inert, no starch (the binder used in much fiberglass) to promote mold, a fire block, vermin proof.


"I've written extensively on the topic of 'flood resistant construction.' "

I would appreciate your pointing me to those writings. With 15 missions to disaster areas under my belt, you can imagine my passion for that subject and I'm continually learning more.


"There are almost no changes on the electrical side of things."

Are you thinking that receptacles etc. could still be used after a flood? Oh, we should probably specify that my concern is salt water floods; I think a fresh water flood may result in less or different damage.


"There's a lot you can do regarding wall construction"

Yes, and foundations (to withstand scouring). Although, the one intact, rebuildable structure we found along 10 miles of beachfront in MS had its first floor blown out and that was probably a good thing (structure was 10x12 I-beam hot-riveted).



"It's those 'little' floods you can address."

I haven't been to any areas with 'little' floods :cry:



"That brings up electrical design. ...the clean-up is greatly complicated.

Granted. The not-up-to-code or badly designed buildings are prone to need repair regardless of disasters. It's just more difficult when a huge area needs the services of professionals all at the same time.

I look forward to reading more of your thinking on all this. Thanks.
 

G._S._Ohm

Senior Member
Location
DC area
Assuming the jacket insulating value is not compromised I'd think you'd see increased leakage only between the ground conductor and the others.

I'll have to try this sometime with a foot of Romex, a 24 hr. soak and a DVM.
It may be less than 20 megohms. If it's 10 megohms per foot then 50' of Romex should read 200k.
 

Dt plug

Member
Location
NJ
I think more than the salt water itself would be the possibility that the wire was submersed in water that may have contaminants such as gas , oil , raw sewage Ect . I don't understand why people are still running romex under houses . Run it at least through the walls , very little need to go under a house except to save time and materials, drill a few more holes and charge for it. Plus all the romex I am running across under a house has not been stapled with SS. Staples and the rust is eating through the jacket.
 

renosteinke

Senior Member
Location
NE Arkansas
Ladyluck, I appreciate your kind words.

Posting is always a challenge - say too little and you confuse, say too much and you bore.

Flooding is a matter of degree - for every place that is completely submerged, there are hundreds of places where the waters were only chest high, waist high, knee high, or less. We're building houses, not submarines. That place I mentioned with the receptacles at 5-ft.? The area could be counted on to flood anywhere from knee-deep to waist-deep every Spring. Sure, there MIGHT be a worse year ... the point was to design to reasonable expectations.

ADA "rules" place receptacles at 18", and - as I'll discuss later - this can make a huge difference in flood damage. Contrast this to the desires of some to place the receptacles as low as possible.

I wasn't clear enough what I meant when I referred to 'salt.' I didn't just mean salt air and coastal exposures. I did not mean sea water. No, I was referring to the salts (not table salt) that are used to make things like insulation fire and mold resistant. Even gypsum - the stuff drywall is made of - is a kind of salt. That stuff is just fine, as long as it's dry ... but water-soaked insulation will create a very corrosive 'micro environment' all around it as it dries, and that means the wiring devices are going to corrode.

It doesn't make much sense to replace any devices until that moisture is out of the walls- or you'll just corrode the new devices. The easiest thing to do is to replace the devices - but do it next year.

Most of my "writings" are at various forums, like the one at Fine Homebuilding. Most often, they're in the context of a flooded basement, or 'finishing' a basement. No matter; the same issues arise.

Here's the thing to remember: materials 'wick' water. 1" of water on the floor will wick 6" up drywall and 12" up any fiberous insulation. Framing lumber is pretty slow to absorb water, but the steel channels of metal framing trap water in the wall.

I think you can now see why I say even 'little' floods can cause an expensive repair bill.

You'll never keep water out; the key is providing good drainage.
First thing to address are the floors. It's amazing how many floors have high spots at the doors and around the sump pump. Think about throw rugs in place of wall-to-wall carpet.
Next are the walls. Keep the drywall, etc., from ever touching the floor. The only thing touching the floor should be your non-absorbant PVC trim or rubber Cove base. If you're using metal framing, every stud bay needs a 'weep hole' in it. Use a scribe, awl, or nail to make one. Consider using non-absorbant materials - Tileboard, Foam insulation, etc. - for the lower part of the wall.

Electrically? Well, if your panel is in the basement, I'd make sure I could kill power to it from above grade somewhere. Give serious thought to where you want the pump power to come from. Plan your circuits so each room can have multiple blowers running.
 

LadyLuck

Member
Location
South Carolina
"Ladyluck, I appreciate your kind words. Posting is always a challenge - say too little and you confuse, say too much and you bore."

You're very welcome. Actually, I think I bore my friends talking about this stuff :lol:, so I appreciate this forum where people are trying to think through it and are willing to share info, experience, etc.


"Flooding is a matter of degree - for every place that is completely submerged, there are hundreds of places where the waters were only chest high, waist high, knee high, or less. We're building houses, not submarines. That place I mentioned with the receptacles at 5-ft.? The area could be counted on to flood anywhere from knee-deep to waist-deep every Spring. Sure, there MIGHT be a worse year ... the point was to design to reasonable expectations."

Agreed. My own house was not in a flood zone but, by the time it got here, the surge was 8 1/2' ASL and that was enough to push 46" into the house, i.e. enough to affect sheetrock, appliance motors, the HVAC (which was on the ground), and Romex and receptacles. Furnishings that were old (= solid wood but not oak), the old heart pine floors and clothing and rag paper books actually fared well but that's a topic for a different thread. And all the houses (100s at this point) that I've worked on in disaster relief got that much or more water. Some were in known flood zones but others weren't (5 miles from the beach on the Gulf Coast, it went over the roof of a house 8' up on pilings!).

You bring up an excellent point with "reasonable expectations"; that would be partly determined by the code (the new one to be adopted, no doubt, after a disaster) and partly by the building owner's assessment of risk and desire to mitigate that, as well as his financial ability to do so.


"ADA "rules" place receptacles at 18", and - as I'll discuss later - this can make a huge difference in flood damage. Contrast this to the desires of some to place the receptacles as low as possible."

I've been thinking about receptacle height, even more so since you mentioned it, and the only reason I can think of for keeping them low is aesthetic. Having poured more sweat equity than I can count into houses I don't own and plenty into my own house, aesthetic is no longer the only factor in my decision-making.


"I wasn't clear enough what I meant when I referred to 'salt.' I didn't just mean salt air and coastal exposures. I did not mean sea water. No, I was referring to the salts (not table salt) that are used to make things like insulation fire and mold resistant. Even gypsum - the stuff drywall is made of - is a kind of salt. That stuff is just fine, as long as it's dry ... but water-soaked insulation will create a very corrosive 'micro environment' all around it as it dries, and that means the wiring devices are going to corrode."

Wow, I had never thought of that. You're right. I do know that drywall is my least favorite building material. The paper covered version grows mold very well; we encountered big tarantua looking stuff in Ft Pierce FL and just-as-nasty other stuff elsewhere.

An aside that might interest some people: when we were working in FL and NC in 2003 and 2004, the standard mold treatment (mostly due to fiberglass holding the moisture in the walls because of its starch binder) was spraying with clorox after gutting to the studs. After Katrina, they began requiring mold mitigation specialists. I've been reading about blasting with dry ice as a treatment and that makes a lot of sense; less mess to clean up, probably.


"Most of my "writings" are at various forums, like the one at Fine Homebuilding. Most often, they're in the context of a flooded basement, or 'finishing' a basement. No matter; the same issues arise.

Here's the thing to remember: materials 'wick' water. 1" of water on the floor will wick 6" up drywall and 12" up any fiberous insulation."

I learned that the hard way. Thought my clothes were safe in the days after Hugo, since they were hung above the water line. However, the closed rod was held by molly bolts and the water wicked up, softened the sheetrock and down she came! I cannot tell you how discouraging it was to hear that sound and see all those clothes down in the mud.


"Framing lumber is pretty slow to absorb water"

Granted, we came on the scene weeks or even months after the storms but the framing was definitely damp and took a while to dry out. That's why we focused on clearing and gutting, to get houses to the drying stage as quickly as possible.


"the steel channels of metal framing trap water in the wall."

Another think I didn't know. I wondered if the rusting that would surely occur would compromise the structure. The one structure I mentioned on the MS coast that withstood the storm surge was powder-coated. It sounds weird for a little old lady to say this, I know, but it was beautiful :D.



"I think you can now see why I say even 'little' floods can cause an expensive repair bill."

Absolutely in agreement with you.


"You'll never keep water out; the key is providing good drainage."

You made me remember that, when my son was little (and very messy), I wanted to build a concrete and tile room for him, with a drain in the center of the floor and nozzles all around so I could instantly clean his room.


"First thing to address are the floors. It's amazing how many floors have high spots at the doors and around the sump pump. Think about throw rugs in place of wall-to-wall carpet."

And use materials that don't buckle. Oak flooring, even old stuff, will buckle right out of its moorings. Anything layered will probably delaminate unless it's glued with waterproof glue (not as common as you would think for flooring). And you're absolutely correct about carpet. The only thing it's good for after a flood is for cutting into 4' wide x 8' long strips and using as skids to cart out the debris. We got to where we preferred that over wheelbarrows because it cut down on the volume of stuff we had to pack for a mission.


"Next are the walls. Keep the drywall, etc., from ever touching the floor. The only thing touching the floor should be your non-absorbant PVC trim or rubber Cove base. If you're using metal framing, every stud bay needs a 'weep hole' in it. Use a scribe, awl, or nail to make one. Consider using non-absorbant materials - Tileboard, Foam insulation, etc. - for the lower part of the wall. "

Excellent points. A chair rail with solid wood below is aesthetically pleasing, too. The houses with solid wood paneling fared well in every storm-hit place we've been (my own house included).



"Electrically? Well, if your panel is in the basement, I'd make sure I could kill power to it from above grade somewhere. Give serious thought to where you want the pump power to come from. Plan your circuits so each room can have multiple blowers running."

All good points. Thank you. And thank you for sharing these more widely, too. Fine Homebuilding has wide distribution and I'm glad you've spoken through it. I do believe you're right that it is wise for us to plan for such disasters. And, hopefully, not need it.

Blessings on you...
 

LadyLuck

Member
Location
South Carolina
I think more than the salt water itself would be the possibility that the wire was submersed in water that may have contaminants such as gas , oil , raw sewage Ect . I don't understand why people are still running romex under houses . Run it at least through the walls , very little need to go under a house except to save time and materials, drill a few more holes and charge for it. Plus all the romex I am running across under a house has not been stapled with SS. Staples and the rust is eating through the jacket.

I do agree about the 'spaghetti' that's under many houses and personally think running conduit is worth it in flood prone areas. If the insulation is in good shape (some types will be) then conduit should make rewiring faster and easier.

You bring up an EXCELLENT point abou the staples! And not only do non-stainless staples rust, the wood swells, enough that I found several shorts in mine (1989, so the wiring wasn't required to be replaced in the reno) CAUSED by the cable being pinched between staples and the wood! The wood in the house swoll enough to jam the doors and windows into their frames for weeks (until they dried out a bit), so it shouldn't have surprised me that other stuff would be affected.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top