IMO, the LR would count as part of the 24" nipple maximum length. However, it is not clear in the NEC- that would be an ahj call.
IMO, the LR would count as part of the 24" nipple maximum length. However, it is not clear in the NEC- that would be an ahj call.
There you go being logical again.
I'm not so sure that you will find the words in the NEC to make that opinion enforceable.
I stated that---I'm not so sure that you will find the words in the NEC to make that opinion enforceable.
The OP said the total length is 21" so for most of the info int this thread the point is moot. :roll:
We still don't know exactly what the question is.![]()
whats the 25 inch rule?
chapter 9, table 1, note 4
Does the 24" include the length of the LR or not?My Bad 24 inch rule
I don't think the words are there to go against his opinion either.
.
Exactly. Replace conduit body with junction box - we still have two short nipples with a box or conduit body between them. A conduit body and a junction box are the same when it comes dealing with raceway fill or ampacity adjustments, you could also interchange them with a cabinet, cut out box, meter socket, outlet/device box, or handhole enclosure for that matter, and it still won't change your conduit fill or ampacity adjustments.You mean other than the fact one is listed as a raceway or nipple and the other is listed as a conduit body?
There is no provision to permit a 60% fill of the conduit body. See 314.16(C)(1). (assuming the conduit body is of the same trade size as the conduit)
I think assuming same trade size as the conduit - 314.16(C)(1) sends you to ch9 table 1 for fill. If the raceway can take the fill why can't the conduit body, it is kind of an extension of the raceway, yet is also not a raceway.
I think assuming same trade size as the conduit - 314.16(C)(1) sends you to ch9 table 1 for fill. If the raceway can take the fill why can't the conduit body, it is kind of an extension of the raceway, yet is also not a raceway.