jaggedben
Senior Member
- Location
- Northern California
- Occupation
- Solar and Energy Storage Installer
[/I]
The exact language of the Code section (2011), that the first(closest to the GTI) overcurrent device is the one which must be used all the way through seems to require that the sum of the branch breakers at the combiner be used upstream rather than the size of the combiner main breaker. That is contrary to what you say the experts agree on, and therefore seems to call for a revision to the Code language.
If it said "previous" rather than "first", then the interpretation you refer to might be justified.
'Previous' is precisely the interpretation they were trying to eliminate. "First or smallest combined" might have been the right language. But the 2014 code will make this argument obsolete by using 125% of inverter output for all calculations. So the actual breaker sizes will no longer matter.