NEC editions

Status
Not open for further replies.

infinity

Moderator
Staff member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Journeyman Electrician
Does anyone have a list of all of the years (code editions) that NEC was published?
 

infinity

Moderator
Staff member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Journeyman Electrician
I glanced at the list but it contains things like these consecutive years:

1897, 1899, 1901, 1903, 1904, 1905, 1907, 1909, 1911, 1913, 1915, 1918, 1920, 1923, 1925, 1926, 1928,
1930, 1931, 1933, 1935, 1937, 1940, 1942, 1943, 1947, 1949, 1951, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956, 1957,
1958, 1959
, 1962, 1965, 1968, 1971, 1975, 1978, 1981, 1984, 1987, 1990, 1993, 1996, 1999, 2002,
2005, 2008, and 2011.

We're there separate editions for every year on the list? If so I'm assuming that not much changed from one year to the next.
 

texie

Senior Member
Location
Fort Collins, Colorado
Occupation
Electrician, Contractor, Inspector
I glanced at the list but it contains things like these consecutive years:



We're there separate editions for every year on the list? If so I'm assuming that not much changed from one year to the next.

Yes these are all separate editions. As you can see, the NEC has not always been on a 3 year cycle. As you noted, some years there was a new edition every year. But also note that there was a 1971 and then the next edition was 1975.
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
I glanced at the list but it contains things like these consecutive years:



We're there separate editions for every year on the list? If so I'm assuming that not much changed from one year to the next.
Not that I was around yet, but wasn't there lots of changes in the electrical world in the time period where there was a new code practically every year, maybe there was changes simply because of necessity from a lot evolving products and technology at that time.

Those older code books also were much simpler than those of the last 20-30 years and likely wasn't as big of a process to make changes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top