225.7 Lighting Equipment installed Outdoors

Status
Not open for further replies.
It has been long practice to use a common neutral with 480/277 line to neutral only (277 VAC) roadway lighting fixtures. Additionally single pole breakers or fuses are utilized so if one leg or fixture experiences a failure the entire section of the highway lighting is not lost. Does section 225.7 still allow this type of installation or does 240.15 and 210.4 now make this a non-compliant installation with the 2011 NEC? Thank you advance for any assistance.
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
It has been long practice to use a common neutral with 480/277 line to neutral only (277 VAC) roadway lighting fixtures. Additionally single pole breakers or fuses are utilized so if one leg or fixture experiences a failure the entire section of the highway lighting is not lost. Does section 225.7 still allow this type of installation or does 240.15 and 210.4 now make this a non-compliant installation with the 2011 NEC? Thank you advance for any assistance.

If any single pole breakers are on a portion of the circuit which is no longer an MWBC (individual neutral originates at the same point as the breaker or earlier) there would be no conflict. And if there are only single line to neutral loads, only a handle tie would be required, not a common trip.

But for safe maintenance, where the breakers are going to be used as disconnects, handle ties or opening the whole MWBC at an upstream point would be required. And the code seems to mandate handle ties.
 

texie

Senior Member
Location
Fort Collins, Colorado
Occupation
Electrician, Contractor, Inspector
It has been long practice to use a common neutral with 480/277 line to neutral only (277 VAC) roadway lighting fixtures. Additionally single pole breakers or fuses are utilized so if one leg or fixture experiences a failure the entire section of the highway lighting is not lost. Does section 225.7 still allow this type of installation or does 240.15 and 210.4 now make this a non-compliant installation with the 2011 NEC? Thank you advance for any assistance.

IMO 240.15(B)(1) does not apply in this case and you can use single pole breakers.
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
IMO 240.15(B)(1) does not apply in this case and you can use single pole breakers.
Can you expand on why you think that (B)(1) [2011] does not apply?
And if it does not apply, then under (B) you would have to use a common trip multi pole breaker instead of just handle ties.
Are you saying that none of (B) applies?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top