Dedicated Circuits Neutrals

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dennis Alwon

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Occupation
Retired Electrical Contractor
A dedicated vs separate circuit is the argument-- As I seeit a dedicated circuit should not share a neutral and a separate circuit may share it. Others may disagree.
 

Dennis Alwon

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Occupation
Retired Electrical Contractor
And I see it just the opposite.

Of course-- it couldn't be that easy that we would all agree. I see dedicate as both conductors having to be dedicated . If the neutral is shared then it is not dedicated to the circuit that requires it as dedicated. Whereas a separate circuit does not imply to me that the neutral cannot be shared. I can see it both ways but I see it clearer my way. :p
 

iceworm

Curmudgeon still using printed IEEE Color Books
Location
North of the 65 parallel
Occupation
EE (Field - as little design as possible)
curiousity question-
The opinions on "dedicated circuit" - are they regulatory based, or design philosophy basaed?

I suspect the only one I ever put in was the ckt for the refrigerator (home DIY) or maybe a generator charger (work). Is this the kind of stuff being discussed?

ice
 
Last edited:

charlie b

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Lockport, IL
Occupation
Retired Electrical Engineer
Neither the phrase "dedicated circuit" nor the phrase "separate circuit" has any standard meaning. The NEC will not have any answers. The only similar phrase defined in the NEC is "Individual Branch Circuit." So the OP's question does not make sense to me. I would ask the OP to explain what "dedicated circuit" is intended to mean.
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
I see dedicated as meaning the same thing as individual branch circuit...a circuit dedicated to a specific piece of equipment, but there is nothing to prohibit the sharing of a neutral with other individual branch circuits.

Separate is not a defined term, but I see that as a circuit where its conductors are not shared with other circuits, but again nothing in the code to say that.
 

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
IMO, dedicated circuit means it only powers a single piece of utilization equipment. Wiring can be either individual branch circuit or as part of a multiwire branch circuit.

So my answer to the OP is, the neutral conductor can be either shared or not.
 

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
IMO, dedicated circuit means it only powers a single piece of utilization equipment. Wiring can be either individual branch circuit or as part of a multiwire branch circuit.

So my answer to the OP is, the neutral conductor can be either shared or not.
FWIW, the individual branch circuit definition and use of the term throughout the Code does not limit such circuit to using a non-shared neutral (or grounded) conductor. From this perspective, a dedicated circuit is essentially an individual branch circuit and vice versa.

However, I believe the intent of individual branch circuit is to limit conductors to not being shared by any other load.
 

Dennis Alwon

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Occupation
Retired Electrical Contractor
So it seems we really don't know the answer so it is best to not share the neutral and you can't go wrong. I tend to think the terms are really the same and as others have stated not defined in the book. Individual is defined but is open to interpretation as to whether or not the neutral should be shared
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
When we talk about a shared neutral, is there any situation other than an MWBC where the neutral is allowed to be shared?
If the circuit originates as an MWBC, can we still call one of the derived circuits an individual branch circuit?
At the least there will be a handle tie if not a common trip breaker, so totally independent of the conductor issue the control of the circuit will not be independent.

Tapatalk!
 
Last edited:

charlie b

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Lockport, IL
Occupation
Retired Electrical Engineer
A MWBC is one circuit. An individual branch circuit can supply only one utilization equipment. Since a MWBC must necessarily supply more than one utilization equipment, a circuit cannot be both an individual branch circuit and a MWBC.
 

david luchini

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Connecticut
Occupation
Engineer
A MWBC is one circuit. An individual branch circuit can supply only one utilization equipment. Since a MWBC must necessarily supply more than one utilization equipment, a circuit cannot be both an individual branch circuit and a MWBC.

I don't think that that is entirely true...


210.4 Multiwire Branch Circuits
. (A) General. ...A multiwire circuit shall be permitted to be considered as multiple circuits.
 

infinity

Moderator
Staff member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Journeyman Electrician
I don't think that that is entirely true...


210.4 Multiwire Branch Circuits
. (A) General. ...A multiwire circuit shall be permitted to be considered as multiple circuits.

I agree. A 4 wire (A,B,C,N) MWBC from a 3?, Wye system would be 3 circuits. In some cases it can be considered one circuit, like in 225.30.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top