Thanks Jeremy. I see what you mean about conductor fill. But it sounds like I will still have to size the three conductors based on ampacities listed in Table 310.15(B)(16) rather than the ampacities listed in Table 310.15(B)(17)...? I was trying to find somewhere in the code that defined the length of a nipple such that it was not considered to be a raceway. For example, would the use of a close nipple or chase nipple be reason enough to mandate ampacity sizing according to Table 310.15(B)(16)...?, or is the length of the close nipple (raceway) so short that it is considered negligible and thus allow ampacity sizing as if it were in free air Table 310.15(B)(17)?
Forget free air. It does not apply here what so ever.
Ampacity is Table 310.15(B)(16)
And as already stated, Chapter 9 note 4
(4) Where conduit or tubing nipples having a maximum
length not to exceed 600 mm (24 in.) are installed between
boxes, cabinets, and similar enclosures, the
nipples shall be permitted to be filled to 60 percent of
their total cross-sectional area, and 310.15(B)(3)(a) ad-
justment factors need not apply to this condition.